David B. is a sanctimonious, condescending, pompous ass.

JillGat recalls being described as a “mere fucking ignorant twat.”

A mere fucking ignorant twat? One wonders what the next level is! With hard work and diligence, is it possible to be promoted to Deputy Assistant I.T.? Is there a Chairman and Chief Executive I.T. somewhere that all the mere’s aspire to become? How does one get on the selection committee for I.T. promotions? What are the criteria? The mind boggles.


Livin’ on Tums, Vitamin E and Rogaine

Phaedrus wrote:

If you’re referring to the 18 bazillion posts you made in the “The Earth Is Flat, I Read in the Paper” thread over in GD – that’s not a long-running battle between you and David, that’s a long-running battle between you and fucking reality.


The truth, as always, is more complicated than that.

FIT?

How very sad. It always distresses me when a twat is ignorant of fucking. It seems like such a waste . . .


The best lack all conviction
The worst are full of passionate intensity.
*

Dammit, tracer, I just splurted coffee all over my keyboard!

Double dammit - I think I peed in my pants, too.


Carpe diem - Seize the day
Carpe noctem - Seize the night
Carpe cerevisi - Seize the beer

[[JillGat recalls being described as a “mere fucking ignorant twat.”]]

No the “mere” was mine, comparing one of the times I was insulted on the board to David’s. The actual quote in the post was “Fuck that ignorant twat.” So it didn’t convey an ignorance of fucking so much as a directive to others to do so with/to me.
JillGat, MS, FIT

Wow – Finally that’s a prime directive that Kirk could have obeyed.


The best lack all conviction
The worst are full of passionate intensity.
*

Ooops – please ignore the that’s.

I changed the line in mid thought and then blew the edit. Sheesh, that’s what I get for resorting to a Trek reference. What can I say; I;m a hcild of my age.

Damn – my fingers hate me.

What the fuck is up with this coventry. It looks like this is just an excuse for DavidB to answer only what he wants to answer. This has been true of DavidB from the beginning. Someone will give an articulate and well thought out post, and DavidB will cut and paste it to shreds picking out of context. Now that we are on to him, and are posting more carefully, he just bans certain posters to coventry, how convenient.

I never had much respect for his argumentative style. He’s a weak man who cannot bear any criticism to his viewpoints. He is base, hypocritical (coventry to a certain poster is because of his/her attacks? He has attacked plenty, himself), and terminally self-deluded. A poorer moderator I have never seen. If coventry is deserved of anyone, it is DavidB.

Other than that, I think he’s a great guy.


There’s always another beer.

–Phaedrus

It is impersonal only if your posts are not your true ideas. If the subject is personal to you, then no matter what your screenname, it will still be personal.

Stick with ‘Phraedrus’. A new name will only cause confusion.

p.s. there is no evidence that KGB was you. Whatever happened to him anyway, I hope KGB shows up again someday…


There’s always another beer.

Well now, Sue, you KNOW that that’s okay around here. As a moderator, David can, with impunity, attack the members all he wants.

He just can’t criticize anything the other moderators say.

-Melin

I don’t know whats with you people. You don’t even know that David gives half of all his earnings to charity,stood outside in a blizzard last week ringing a bell for the salvation army,gives blood every day… :wink:

Yeah, but whose blood is he giving, orange cakes?
pat

There is a small pin-prick in vien. Maybe while I slept?

Orangecakes asks us to consider:

::Considering::
::Trying, really trying, to picture David B. in a Santa suit ringing a bell to raise $$ to help bring Christ to the lost sheep::
::Shaking head, reaching for whiskey::

Orangecakes, that blizzard can only be in Hell.


Sue from El Paso

Experience is what you get when you didn’t get what you wanted.

Beeruser:

More in the way of a nunnery, perhaps? :slight_smile:

What about whining? How could you have skipped whining?

All I can think of is those little spoons in the grocery - you know the ones, covered with soft stuff at the business end so baby doesn’t crack his new teeth?

Then I get a picture of those bibs made of plastic with the little turned up part at the bottom so the drool gets caught, can’t you just see it fill up as he posts the same reply over and over?

I saw this big sign “NO WHINING” at a card shop and thought I’d send it to David B for Christmas; well, you know the rest.


Oh, I’m gonna keep using these #%@&* codes 'til I get 'em right.

Tough crowd.

Now that’s real Christian love for you! I guess it’s o.k. to sling the crap around if you’re doing it for God. For those of you who don’t know what all the whining is about, Brother D started a thread because he, an ATHEIST dared to suggest that some of the Christmas celebrating in the public schools bothered him. He was a bit snide about it, I admit, but atheists these days don’t exactly get to play on a level field, do they? What followed was a lot of,“Well, why don’t you complain about Halloween, huh?” and,“What about St. Patrick’s Day, huh?” etc. When he finally gave up on the thread, it turned into a long rant on Brother D never answering all their questions. When that started to look a little shrill for the Great Debate section, this little bit of self-congratulatory puffery was started.
By the way, Sue. Before you start patting yourself on the back about all the support you are recieving on this thread, consider who is supporting you:Story Tyler-A chiropractic true believer for life based on a personal incident, Phaedrus-Who true beliefs may never be known, and John John-Who apparently spends his time on the board looking fires he can throw fuel on. Nice group of supporters you have there. Would you trust any of them at your side in a real fight?

Slythe

And David has you, no bargin indeed, who follows him around with a broom? What credibility do YOU have, a David B. apologist? You answer for HIM, telling us what HE meant, what is in HIS heart, what HE was really saying, which contradicts HIS posted words. How could you possibly know that? How can YOU throw any stones.

Incidently, didn’t David B. post that he was agnostic? If I recall, he posted that he was agnostic and atheist at different times.


Y2K, BFD