No, you’re being called an idiot for generalizing. You get no argument from me on the useleness of this action.
Sweeping generalizations?
65% of population equal the majority, meaning I CAN say that most of the public is for against the war.
Up until now, I doubted that you were 6 years old.
Yes, that’s right. That’s exactly it. It’s part of a conspiracy, I think.
It certainly couldn’t be that you are failing to present anything close to a coherent argument.
Please stop arguing against the war before you accidentally change my mind and make me support it.
Dear Q.E.D.
From your cite:
65 PERCENT OF AMERICA IS FOR THE WAR!
So, therefore I am not making a sweeping generaliaztion when I say the majority of america is for the war.
You never said “most”. Show me where you said “most” before the quoted statement, and i’ll eat my television.
Did you make a valid(or anytihng near to one) point against my arguement?
No, you decided to insult me.
This shows me none of you can argue against me.
Do you even know what the word “generalizing” means?
I’ve said majority.
It still is the same thing.
You didn’t say"majority" until I posted that poll. Your OP and a few posts after that implied we all felt that way. Quit weaseling.
Rather than make a pont against my arguement, you pursue the idea that I do not understand the words I use to describe my position.
A generaliazation, is for ex. where you say “alot of americans are for abortion” where 25% might agree with that staement.
Look, kid, go read some war debates in GD and learn how this is done.
Posting an inflammatory OP calling the Americans idiots is not starting a debate.
Dumbass.
Stop arguing about the words that I’ve used to say my position, and start actually debating my position.
No, moron. A generalization is when you say “all Americans…” or “every person…” or “Americans want…”. And why would I make a point against your argument when I agree with it, in its essence, that is, that the war is pointless?
I am right, and because I am saying the americans are idiots for wanting to kill the iraquis, I am getting attacked without any real arguement from the americans/people for the war. Instead, I am being told I am an idiot because I insult the majority of america for being idiots.
Unless you have a real arguement, get the fuck out of this thread.
See, dirty tactics for people who couldn’t argue with you for a reason other than your inability to say whatever it is you’re trying to say would be to pont (sic) out that your arguement (sic) about generaliazation (sic) in your staement (sic) above lacks a bit in the spelling department.
If you want a debate, put it in GD and stop your pitiful whining.
pissant.
This is the Pit. OoOOOooooOO. That means that if folks think you’re stupid, they get to call you stupid. I think maybe you can handle that. Right? Right.
And before you start accusing me of being an AMERICAN AND STUPID AND FOR THE WAR! I’m an ex-pat Canuck. And am ambivalent about the action - I’d like to have seen Saddam out of power 10 years ago, but I really don’t want any innocent deaths. Really really don’t want any.
I think I need a drink, after reading this brain pablum.
And the word I’ve used is “majority”, so shut the fuck up unless you have a valid arguement.
Stop arguing linguistics.
Yep, no generalizations there.
Again, attacking my arguements with spelling lessons. That shows that you cannot debate properly, and you’re left to correcting spelling mistakes rather than making a valid arguement.