Zoe, you stupid psycho, your constant use of your magical psychic girl-detective powers to stalk and “out” posters who don’t match whatever bizarre stereotypes you have about them is really starting to piss me off.
You did it with Phlospher and stalked him for at least a year before you gave up.
You did it with Rubystreak and stalked her and were proven wrong and embarrassed yourself (my link isn’t the best example, but I’m sure others will post more)-HA! Here’s the one where you ‘proved’ Rubystreak was a guy 'cause she used the word “cunt”.
You did it with pseudotriton ruber ruber (one of about six billion threads where you did it–note, this is hyperbole), you stalked him at least 2 years (2007-2009), if you weren’t so fucking creepy (when you were researching (and calling?) actual universities trying to figure out which one he did or didn’t work for), you would have been a laughingstock.
And just now, you did it with Rand Rover.
I know you’ve done it with others too, but can’t find the cites at the moment. And you’ve never been right once. NEVER.
What the fuck is your major malfunction? I know you have this warped idea that everyone in a given profession must alway act/write/behave/think a certain way 100% of the time, and if that was all it was, it’d be just pathetic and kinda funny. But it’s not just that 'cause once you get fixated on a poster, you follow them around harassing them both here and in real life and frankly, I’d love to see you warned or banned for it.
You are NOT Miss Marple, you are NOT Nancy Drew, and hell, if you were about 50% better at your ‘detective’ work, you’d almost be on par with one of Inspector Clouseau’s turds for inductive and deductive reasoning.
So how 'bout shutting the fuck up with your psychotic suspicions and go get some therapy, you crazy-assed bitch.
PS–your traditional next step is to post how you were a teacher who taught inner-city kids and had shit flung at you so we should feel sorry for you and how you’re old and have kids and grandkids so you’re old and…I dunno…deserving of respect for that? None of that’s relevant, so, for novelty’s sake, can we skip that part?