There’s also the fact that capital punishment is morally wrong, always and everywhere.
OP fail English? That’s unpossible!
Well…that can be a matter of opinion; not all moral systems agree with this. It isn’t a “fact” so much as it is a variable moral tenet.
(I agree with you on this; my moral system is similar to yours. But…there are real, functional moral systems that are perfectly okay with execution of murderers.)
What have you been smoking and where can I get some? Cuz that has got to be some primo shit.
A person is sexual since the first grade, he grows up by 14 years old having real time active sexual experiences, off of his initial foundation. between 14 years old and 21 years old he has experience consequential sexual violations, that for the most part, by all articulation, no one truly has the scope of, so no responses are made.
this person living to this habit of life, reckons, by all legitimate purpose, for what he committed his life to, on true transaction of his accumulated fault, against the worth of life he experienced since his base line sexual endeavors, the death sentences, covers his span of life.
it turns out however, that since first grade the community has established the concious formation of every child, to public association. Growing them in the classroom, intelligent of the secret intimacies of this child. Thus over turning the powers of concern that child grew to consider, over the depths of his sexual / obligatory responsibility, as a human in society. They did this so, secretly.
At 21 years old, instead of coming to the resolve on that person, to the basis of his life, extended in such a way. They subjected him to a daily subjecation, of all prior experiences, through the carried out participations, generated off of each engagement, ever lived. Their collective comprehension, up against his false perception, generated by imposted neglect/displacement, to the fact of existence between them.
Ultimately, torturing a human being, for the rest of his days, as opposed to sentencing or resolving the point catered, by default, to all inhabitants of that community.
I am basing my assertion for death sentence off of that model. / inquire to your moral integrity, to that matter, as it so in fact, exists.
I still don’t get it.
I suspect I am not alone.
What the HELL are you talking about?
They need to do way instain mother> who kill thier babbys.
Whachu talking 'bout Willis?
Did you type that in another language and run it through a translation program? If so, that’s a lousy translation program.
Marble?
Someone seems to have lost theirs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henryunderborn View Post
A person is sexual since the first grade, he grows up by 14 years old having real time active sexual experiences, off of his initial foundation. between 14 years old and 21 years old he has experience consequential sexual violations, that for the most part, by all articulation, no one truly has the scope of, so no responses are made.
this person living to this habit of life, reckons, by all legitimate purpose, for what he committed his life to, on true transaction of his accumulated fault, against the worth of life he experienced since his base line sexual endeavors, the death sentences, covers his span of life.
it turns out however, that since first grade the community has established the concious formation of every child, to public association. Growing them in the classroom, intelligent of the secret intimacies of this child. Thus over turning the powers of concern that child grew to consider, over the depths of his sexual / obligatory responsibility, as a human in society. They did this so, secretly.
At 21 years old, instead of coming to the resolve on that person, to the basis of his life, extended in such a way. They subjected him to a daily subjecation, of all prior experiences, through the carried out participations, generated off of each engagement, ever lived. Their collective comprehension, up against his false perception, generated by imposted neglect/displacement, to the fact of existence between them.
Ultimately, torturing a human being, for the rest of his days, as opposed to sentencing or resolving the point catered, by default, to all inhabitants of that community.
I am basing my assertion for death sentence off of that model. / inquire to your moral integrity, to that matter, as it so in fact, exists.
I still don’t get it.
I suspect I am not alone.
The cost of never ending support for taking care of people who gave up on the reasonable terms of society.
While simultaneously, society imposing unreasonably absurd conditions of the focus of every day life.
If a multiple murderer can be granted full life catering to, for the rest of his life, multiplied, by X number of degenerates living the same overbearing load on good society.
How then, cannot a child who’s innocent life was relayed, for the support of all common growth, within society, not be granted the equal factor of the circumstance, to his own relevant life; as has been supplied off of his own life.
I mean, for all the people out marching and protesting, for the “years of life” sentiment, against executing a severe criminal, who put himself to those terms, committedly.
Not one of them are out there, even uttering.
“hey, maybe we should stop perpetuating this active disassociation on that one child, whose sex, all of our children have been regarded by. Seeing as how, by any effort we make in continuing this process, we simply could, just address him to the rightful terms, utilized on his life.”
But hey… its… immoral, to remove someones life, who lived it in devoted terms of death havoc and mayhem. While simultaneously, endorsing the entire human race, to falsify reality, upon one child, whos terms of life, were the factor of their unity in the first place.
We are obligated to sustain all human life, no matter its violation.
However, if you are that one unlucky son of a bitch, who was sexual as a child.
“Sorry, the terms of reality, are hereby, automatically, by all obligation of man, falsified on you; by the indulgence of that information. Oh. Ps. every sexual partner, since child hood, has been routed to this course of participation. Falsifying reality on you.”
You honestly, can’t see… the call for… more… active… death sentencing? When such a condition is so devoutly imposed upon a person? Like, just HOW much, that situation, should not even EXIST?? by proper regard, alternatively?
Just to clarify - the masses GATHER, to preserve the life of multiple murderers.
But a human whos sex has been a social cultivation factor for the masses, CANNOT, inhabit life on that equal truth, with another person?
I am telling you. You are all in violation of the existence of this life we have. What you have done in that circumstance, is your safeguard, against the entire, revocation button. All it takes is. ONE PERSON. to tell that guy the truth, and you have flushed it ALL down the drain.
It is baffling.
Oh, they’re uttering all right.
You can say that again.
That’s probably about the only thing you’ve said that makes sense.
Well that much I can agree with.
Henryunderborn - Is that REALLY how you usually speak?
Maybe he’s going through a translation program.
Or it’s a dialect of Authentic Frontier Gibberish.
I think we can all agree on this point. You’re baffled? Me too!
Seriously, Henry - nobody understands you here because you are not making sense. At all. Take a step back, ask a friend to intervene, something. Because in your current frame of mind, you are not succeeding in helping people to understand where you are coming from.