Why isn’t it automatically used for every murder crime. And or other crimes?
Doesn’t it strain the circumstance for all the other end of natural order to overly contend with the obligation towards such people?
Instead of maintaining rotted wood as a ceiling. Supplement the floor to grow like marble?
500,000 murders / manipulators of devious acts of life disruption.
paid for by X money from “good society” trying to get on from the fall out.
500,000 children born into this world, or coming up through under that same condition.
Why isn’t the pledge to America substantial enough, to recognize the exchange rate, of life participation over life degradation?
Isn’t that the essential element, to being a civilized/successful order?
Look up at the rotted ceiling, you see all that shit, coming in and ruining what you have to work with, uh whoa, watch out… all that shit is going to come crashing down on you.
Now if I can grab your attention for a moment.
Look at this marble flooring, gee, can you imagine, just all the promise we have to work with over here?
My floor is carpet, hardwood and some tile because I don’t live in a mausoleum or courthouse. My ceiling is just fine, not rotting or dripping shit onto my house. Maybe you should look into home improvement.
People are garunteed life sentneces, of being fed and clothes and tended to, off your dollars, while worse conditions are imposed on children living at the other end of the spectrum?
/headscratch – the adults living those life sentences already set their perrogative.
it is our responsibility and their dues, to make the necesarry exchange, on the matter.
I think that the OP is saying that we expend a lot of resources in jailing people, and that we would be better off not expending these resources and executing them instead. If that’s the case, then he needs to tell us just how much a life sentence costs, and how much a death sentence does.
Our legal system has far too many flaws in it for the death penalty to work. People are wrongly convicted all the time, and if there is even the smallest chance of an innocent man being executed, then there should not be a death penalty.
Besides the fact that we know there are innocent people who have been imprisoned, there’s also the matter of incentives.
If more crimes are subject to a death sentence, there’s no longer any incentive to moderate one’s behavior. If somebody knows they’ll be killed no matter what, they no longer have a reason not to kill everybody in sight, damage as much property as possible, and generally act like an ass.
I have no opinions on wood vs marble, except that you need more money and much better support, including your foundations, to support the extra weight and cost.