Death sentence

[Canadjun]

@Henryunderborn

I really dont get what you dont understand. let’s make a chart

-2 parents have one Child A
-2 other parents have one Child B
-Children A and B grow up accross the street from another,
-they have sex in first grade through third grade.
-the regulating authority talks to the parents about their sex,
-the parents and that authority talk to child B about that sex
-Child A is left neglected, while Parents+Authority, regard class mates X-Z in all of Child A’s classrooms.
-for 20 years Child A does not have the notion of the existence.
-However, every class mate or sex partner Child A has had, has been regarded as and since, Child B was initially regarded, by parents + authority.
-What resulted was the collective of society, falsifying reality, on Child A, while actively ensuring it, for every other person.
-Instead of processing that reasoning of life, as initiated on Child B, Child A got subjected to an endless perpetuating harassment scheme, that equals out to a daily regiment of Torture, conducted by all those who were regarded by Parents+Authority, in the first place.
-SO-
-A prisoner deserves to be advocated for, conditions of LIFE IMPRISONMENT versus TERMINATION, when he is already set in stone, his fault and betrayal on society, and what that requires of him.
-While a child, whose private sexual affairs, have been base lined, to all public participation, does not deserve, even the RIGHT of mental stationing, based to the fact shared on his life through 20 years of purposeful withholding?

What is it that Child B gets to be incorporated to the fact of Child A’s sex alongside all other strangers?
Why does the collective of strangers positioned to Child As sex, through equal relevance with Child B, blatantly and abusively deny reality, on Child A?
Why when X amount of adults who have lived their life determined to murder and desecrate life, by such, menacing conviction, do they have the support of society, to give them exemption on their betrayal of life?

Yet a child, whose most intimate of private affairs, been made so public, along side all who shared in that intimacy, is still blatantly denied, the factor of that existence, BY ALL PERSISTENCE OF EVERY CITIZEN, ENGAGED AS STATED.

OK - I’m not going to go through every one of your sentences; let’s take some of the more unusual ones one at a time. What in blue blazes is “-they have sex in first grade through third grade.” supposed to mean? Do you mean they have intercourse that young? that they masturbate?

“-Child A is left neglected, while Parents+Authority, regard class mates X-Z in all of Child A’s classrooms.” - do you mean “pay attention to” when you say “regard”?

“Yet a child, whose most intimate of private affairs, been made so public, along side all who shared in that intimacy, is still blatantly denied, the factor of that existence, BY ALL PERSISTENCE OF EVERY CITIZEN, ENGAGED AS STATED.” - I don’t know where to begin - that isn’t English.

[Telemark]

@Henryunderborn

I really dont get what you dont understand. let’s make a chart

-2 parents have one Child A
-2 other parents have one Child B
-Children A and B grow up accross the street from another,
-they have sex in first grade through third grade.
-the regulating authority talks to the parents about their sex,
-the parents and that authority talk to child B about that sex
-Child A is left neglected, while Parents+Authority, regard class mates X-Z in all of Child A’s classrooms.
-for 20 years Child A does not have the notion of the existence.
-However, every class mate or sex partner Child A has had, has been regarded as and since, Child B was initially regarded, by parents + authority.
-What resulted was the collective of society, falsifying reality, on Child A, while actively ensuring it, for every other person.
-Instead of processing that reasoning of life, as initiated on Child B, Child A got subjected to an endless perpetuating harassment scheme, that equals out to a daily regiment of Torture, conducted by all those who were regarded by Parents+Authority, in the first place.
-SO-
-A prisoner deserves to be advocated for, conditions of LIFE IMPRISONMENT versus TERMINATION, when he is already set in stone, his fault and betrayal on society, and what that requires of him.
-While a child, whose private sexual affairs, have been base lined, to all public participation, does not deserve, even the RIGHT of mental stationing, based to the fact shared on his life through 20 years of purposeful withholding?

What is it that Child B gets to be incorporated to the fact of Child A’s sex alongside all other strangers?
Why does the collective of strangers positioned to Child As sex, through equal relevance with Child B, blatantly and abusively deny reality, on Child A?
Why when X amount of adults who have lived their life determined to murder and desecrate life, by such, menacing conviction, do they have the support of society, to give them exemption on their betrayal of life?

Yet a child, whose most intimate of private affairs, been made so public, along side all who shared in that intimacy, is still blatantly denied, the factor of that existence, BY ALL PERSISTENCE OF EVERY CITIZEN, ENGAGED AS STATED.

The Aristocrats!

[zoid]

@Henryunderborn

I really dont get what you dont understand. let’s make a chart

That didn’t help one bit.

Honest question - are you a native English speaker or is it a second or third language for you?

[Ellen_Cherry]

Henryunderborn, you really aren’t being understood here. People aren’t just being obtuse or mean to you. Unless you’re able to write more understandably about the thing you want to discuss, we’re not going to be able to engage with you.

Otherwise, this isn’t going anywhere useful, even for comedic purposes, so unless we get some clarity, I’ll probably close the thread.

[Henryunderborn]

@Henryunderborn

I really dont get what you dont understand. let’s make a chart

-2 parents have one Child A
-2 other parents have one Child B
-Children A and B grow up accross the street from another,
-they have sex in first grade through third grade.
-the regulating authority talks to the parents about their sex,
-the parents and that authority talk to child B about that sex
-Child A is left neglected, while Parents+Authority, regard class mates X-Z in all of Child A’s classrooms.
-for 20 years Child A does not have the notion of the existence.
-However, every class mate or sex partner Child A has had, has been regarded as and since, Child B was initially regarded, by parents + authority.
-What resulted was the collective of society, falsifying reality, on Child A, while actively ensuring it, for every other person.
-Instead of processing that reasoning of life, as initiated on Child B, Child A got subjected to an endless perpetuating harassment scheme, that equals out to a daily regiment of Torture, conducted by all those who were regarded by Parents+Authority, in the first place.
-SO-
-A prisoner deserves to be advocated for, conditions of LIFE IMPRISONMENT versus TERMINATION, when he is already set in stone, his fault and betrayal on society, and what that requires of him.
-While a child, whose private sexual affairs, have been base lined, to all public participation, does not deserve, even the RIGHT of mental stationing, based to the fact shared on his life through 20 years of purposeful withholding?

What is it that Child B gets to be incorporated to the fact of Child A’s sex alongside all other strangers?
Why does the collective of strangers positioned to Child As sex, through equal relevance with Child B, blatantly and abusively deny reality, on Child A?
Why when X amount of adults who have lived their life determined to murder and desecrate life, by such, menacing conviction, do they have the support of society, to give them exemption on their betrayal of life?

Yet a child, whose most intimate of private affairs, been made so public, along side all who shared in that intimacy, is still blatantly denied, the factor of that existence, BY ALL PERSISTENCE OF EVERY CITIZEN, ENGAGED AS STATED.

If you can’t answer that, to its legitimate fact, as you are all stationed by it. I consider you to be a criminal, and its no wonder why you persist on ensuring the preservation of the condemned.

[Boogly]

@Henryunderborn

It is what is being said, it is not gibberish.

Authority recognizes a childs sexual inhabitance, to the growth of all children within society.
That society, participates to that information, by falsifying reality on that child.
Insisting such a circumstance does not exist.

This is the committed task, of society, through that authority. By all given function within that society.

Simultaneously, that same society is insisting the rights of life, for people to be incarcerated rather than terminated from life. No matter…the severity… of their crime.

however, At the same time, NOT regarding that child, whose life, is still under persisted falsification, by the basis of that society.

How do you claim the morality and rights to life for the most heinus of criminals. While ensuring that someone whose innocent life, which has catered to the active function within society, does not hold the terms equal to his own fact shared.

BY WAYS OF TORTURE.

This is not some superficial generic pass over. If every adult can recognize their child, to the sex of another child. How then do they persist on the drive of garunteeing life to criminals, while refusing to articulate the fact of participation, ON THAT CHILD!

DO YOU HAVE DONKEY BRAINS?!

I figured it out.

Yoda is real…but google doesn’t translate Yodanese.

And I vote that this thread serves great comedic purpose.

ETA: See!

[FuriousGeorge]

@Smapti

Your ideas intrigue me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

Speaking of death sentences…

[Inna_Minnit]

The individual words are English. And spelled properly, so kudos on that. The thing is, you can’t just throw random words together and expect others to understand your meaning.

You posts make no sense. None. Zero. They are non-sensical.

Gawd.

[elbows]

“…as you are all stationed by it”

If you’re not even going to make an effort to be understood, why should we be arsed to try and decipher your nonsense?

When come back — bring coherent !

[Monty]

@Henryunderborn

If you can’t answer that, to its legitimate fact, as you are all stationed by it. I consider you to be a criminal, and its no wonder why you persist on ensuring the preservation of the condemned.

The only thing criminal happening in this thread is your treatment of the English language and Logic.

[zoid]

@Henryunderborn

If you can’t answer that, to its legitimate fact, as you are all stationed by it. I consider you to be a criminal, and its no wonder why you persist on ensuring the preservation of the condemned.

Henry, even this is not proper English and cannot be decoded.
If English is not your first language there may be someone on this board who can help you translate in order to get your ideas across.

[Cinnamon_Imp]

Has anyone tried running it through Google translate to another language then back to English to see if it makes sense then?

[Boogly]

I’m thinking the OP is sitting somewhere writing flowing and well thought out paragraphs. The post is edited and re-written until the OP is proud of what is written.

The OP hits translate and posts here, rightfully expecting well thought out responses from differing points of views. The OP goes to get a drink or save a puppy or something and comes back, delighted to see so many responses.

The OP translates our stuff, which is as mind bending to the OP as the OP is to us and mind blown smiley thing.

He responds with another prize worth post and again hits translate, awaiting (y)our nourishing thoughts and intellect. Again he gets derision from us, or whatever the translator program spews at the OP.

His logical response: DONKEY BRAIN!
To which I reply: CAKE FOR FEET!

[Dewey_Finn]

@Inna_Minnit

The individual words are English. And spelled properly, so kudos on that.

The majority of his words, yes. But there are a few misspellings here and there. I’m thinking that perhaps by a careful study of the misspelled words, we might determine where he is. Others have asked him in previous threads whether he’s not a native English speaker, but he seemed offended at the suggestion. I thought he was simply off his meds.

[zoid]

@Dewey_Finn

TI thought he was simply off his meds.

I concede that’s a possibility but I was hoping there was a chance it was a translation issue.

[Dewey_Finn]

A big reason I think that is that some of the threads he’s started sound rational, if a bit confused.

[Claverhouse]

@Cinnamon_Imp

I’m wondering how marble grows, personally.

The marble grows through the ineluctable sacrifice of millions of unimportant sinful beings whose corpses are subjected to immense pressures in that mournful afterlife until melded together strong enough to withstand the Trickster’s wiles, yet ductile enow to be sculpted by the Chisel of the Master Builder.

Only thus can be the Foundation.
Measure thou twice, cutteth thou but once.

[kaylasdad99]

@Henryunderborn

I really dont get what you dont understand. let’s make a chart

-2 parents have one Child A
-2 other parents have one Child B
-Children A and B grow up accross the street from another,
-they have sex in first grade through third grade.
-the regulating authority talks to the parents about their sex,
-the parents and that authority talk to child B about that sex
-Child A is left neglected, while Parents+Authority, regard class mates X-Z in all of Child A’s classrooms.
-for 20 years Child A does not have the notion of the existence.
-However, every class mate or sex partner Child A has had, has been regarded as and since, Child B was initially regarded, by parents + authority.
-What resulted was the collective of society, falsifying reality, on Child A, while actively ensuring it, for every other person.
-Instead of processing that reasoning of life, as initiated on Child B, Child A got subjected to an endless perpetuating harassment scheme, that equals out to a daily regiment of Torture, conducted by all those who were regarded by Parents+Authority, in the first place.
-SO-
-A prisoner deserves to be advocated for, conditions of LIFE IMPRISONMENT versus TERMINATION, when he is already set in stone, his fault and betrayal on society, and what that requires of him.
-While a child, whose private sexual affairs, have been base lined, to all public participation, does not deserve, even the RIGHT of mental stationing, based to the fact shared on his life through 20 years of purposeful withholding?

What is it that Child B gets to be incorporated to the fact of Child A’s sex alongside all other strangers?
Why does the collective of strangers positioned to Child As sex, through equal relevance with Child B, blatantly and abusively deny reality, on Child A?
Why when X amount of adults who have lived their life determined to murder and desecrate life, by such, menacing conviction, do they have the support of society, to give them exemption on their betrayal of life?

Yet a child, whose most intimate of private affairs, been made so public, along side all who shared in that intimacy, is still blatantly denied, the factor of that existence, BY ALL PERSISTENCE OF EVERY CITIZEN, ENGAGED AS STATED.

@Telemark

The Aristocrats!

A-a-a-n-n-n-d…
[/Thread]

[yawuntz]

@Henryunderborn

…DO YOU HAVE DONKEY BRAINS?!

Yes! And I get it! I get it!

[Ambivalid]

@Henryunderborn

If you can’t answer that, to its legitimate fact, as you are all stationed by it. I consider you to be a criminal, and its no wonder why you persist on ensuring the preservation of the condemned.

Ouch.