Again, the Empire parked a ship full of detainees next to the detention block. That’s not a coincidence.
How much power do you think it took the technicians at Chernobyl to disable the automatic control rod management? Here’s a hint: not a lot. A little bit of power in the wrong place can absolutely cause a catastrophic failure of a reactor.
I’ve seen the movie (and enjoyed it) and I defend almost all of what Aeschines has said about it. The writers did NOT articulate the current state of politics in the galaxy well at all. For the last 30+ years we’ve all been under the impression that the rebels won. There was a sense at the end of ROTJ that the empire was dead. In the movie what we see is right back to the status quo, which doesn’t make much sense given the events of ROTJ, but then they muck it up even worse by talking about a Republic/Senate as a separate entity to this resistance.
Look, if your enemy builds something called the fucking Starkiller that can literally consume a star and use it to destroy multiple planets at once, it’s no longer time to arm the resistance and hope they can take it out with some well placed proton torpedoes. No, that’s when you send in the fucking Star Destroyers that you seized when you destroyed the Empire and took the galaxy back over. You did do that, right? I mean, the Republic should have an army or something.
I understand this is Star Wars and the details don’t so much matter, but I can’t understand how any of this made it through the first draft. Just have Snoke et al find some unfinished secret weapon from the time of the Empire and explain that they’ve spent the last 30 years just trying to get it to work. It shouldn’t look polished and menacing like the Starkiller base because they shouldn’t have the resources to do so. Have it look like it’s been patched together and then have them suddenly start blowing up planets, like one after the other, at an alarming rate (say, they figure out how to send massive “blaster” shots through hyperspace). So fast, in fact, that their plan is clearly a Blitzkrieg attempt (hello Nazi imagery) to catch the Republic off guard. The Republic would have, of course, scrambled Star Destroyers to try and stop it but our plucky heroes find themselves, by dint of luck, in the right place at the right time to save the day before the Republic is completely destroyed.
This sets up Episode 8 to explain why Luke is needed all of a sudden. As it is, we’re left wondering why he’s been sitting on his ass while the First Order has seemingly been growing unchecked, and why now everyone wants to find him now that the crisis of the Starkiller base has been apparently averted.
It just seems that any Star Wars fan with a decent head on their shoulders could have come up with a cleaner plot that wouldn’t have detracted at all from the spectacle. It’s not so much that they ruined it, it’s just hard to understand why it wasn’t a hair better.
I think that there was enough evidence in the movies to infer the answers to most of these questions. In RotJ, it appeared that the Emperor was directing the battle from the Death Star, using the Force. When he dies, it appears that the Empire Fleet no longer has any coordination, and the battle starts going bad for them pretty quickly. From that, I infer that the Emperor was holding his Empire together through sheer force of will, and that when he died there was nothing to keep his regional governors together. The Empire splintered into a myriad of Regional governments, all competing to either bring back the Empire, or to form the New Republic. By the point of TFA, The New Republic has built back up, and now has a new Senate, but it does not control Cosuscant, as the Senate is in another system. The First Order is one of the splinter groups of the Empire, and it led by Snoke, who is a force user, but not a Sith. He has brought together a significant portion of the old Empire fleet and resources. The New Republic and First Order are roughly equal in power. They can hold their own territory, but cannot make serious inroads against the other without leaving their own area in danger. The New Republic resorts to the strategy it knows the best, supporting a group of partisans within First Order territory, the Resistance. Meanwhile, the First Order resorts to the strategy it knows best, and builds a giant super weapon to force the rest of the Galaxy into line.
There, a self-consistent back story that ties the movies together…
To be fair, there isn’t anything in the movie that actually explains the Starkiller or goes to any length to justify its existence. It’s not any deeper than: “You guys liked the Empire and the Death Star, right? Ummmm… here’s Empire v2.0 and a bigger Death Star! That one was like a moon but this one is a planet!”
Yes, because attempts at detailed descriptions of complex political systems worked so well in the prequels.
I mean, could there have been more info? Sure. But the movie was already over 2 hours long, and most of it can be reasonably extrapolated.
We did get the sense that victory would be inevitable, perhaps, but not necessarily instant. I know when the enhanced RotJ came out with the celebration scene on Coruscant, my first thought was “yeah, and 10 minutes after the camera cuts away, the gunships come in and start firing on the crowds.”
In the movie what we see is right back to the status quo, which doesn’t make much sense given the events of ROTJ, but then they muck it up even worse by talking about a Republic/Senate as a separate entity to this resistance.
Do we have evidence that the Republic knew/believed the weapon existed or worked? Or was it more like “Yeah, I’ve heard that the First Order is spending most of their GDP on some boondongle that will never work.”
Here is another point that rather irritated me about Starkiller base. First, I’m very confused about how they fire this thing twice. The first time they used it, they didn’t apparently drain the sun dry as it was quite bright. So why did it eat the star the second time? Would it have gone back to being bright? Or did they plan to move the entire planet… somehow? It would have been rather funny had the Resistance just up and moved, letting the First Order use their second and final shot to blow up an empty planet.
Also, apparently the star system blown up in the film was the Hosnian system, and apparently this was supposed to be the headquarters of the Republic. It would have been nice had the actual movie told us that, instead of having it be something that showed up on a wiki because it was in a book sold separately. :smack:
There’s probably a middle ground between no info and two hours of intergalactic C-SPAN. A good director would find it instead of relying on “But the prequels!” as an excuse.
Maybe you had that sense at the end of ROTJ, but I happen to remember the first Star Wars movie:
In other words: the Emperor just intentionally de-centralized the Empire.
At the end of A New Hope, the Death Star was destroyed, which means no more “fear of this battle station.” Yet, at the beginning of Empire Strikes Back, we are given no reason to think that the Empire has been weakened in the slightest. We see a bigger flagship and a bigger fleet than we ever saw before.
ROTJ differs from ANH in that it killed Vader and the Emperor as well as a Death Star, but let’s go back to that quote. It doesn’t say “The Emperor is so beloved that he’ll hold it together through force of personality alone!” No, it clearly explains that regional governors have control. (Furthermore, the Death Star’s leadership is willing to mock Vader to his face; the rubber-meets-the-road leadership of the Empire doesn’t give a damn about him when he’s not choking them.)
All that ROTJ buys the Rebellion is hope that regional governors won’t unite under new leadership and finish them off. The Rebellion would benefit from Imperial disunity, but was in no position to initiate anything on a big scale.
Which is kind of where Episode 7 puts us… though you’re correct that the movie is so incredibly vague you could explain it in just about any way except by thinking that ROTJ mattered.
It only seems like they are close because nobody wants to watch 3 hours of trekking across the station. It’s the same reason they never show people circling 30 minutes for a parking spot. It’s foolish to think they would show the entire journey; even a pastiche would detract from the pacing.
This was the part of the movie that lost me. Okay, I can swallow a planet-sized gun sucking energy off of its host star to fire a hyper-luminous weapon at other planets many light years away. Whatever. But then the gun has to go and suck up ALL THE STELLAR MATERIAL before its planned second shot. Umm… did anyone bother to calculate just how much MASS that would be??? Assuming an Earth-like solar system, the sun would be 3.3 million times larger than the planet itself!! And even if you fanwank some method of compression into a neutronium-like substance, the actual mass would remain unchanged. This would make the planet’s gravity TWENTY-EIGHT times stronger than normal Earth gravity – way strong enough to kill everyone on the planet, since your blood could no longer reach your brain.
And what was the point of sucking up all the solar mass, anyway? How would they manage to fire the gun a third time? That makes no sense at all.
And after all that, we got cheated out of witnessing a supernova-sized explosion when Starkiller was destroyed. Instead, the planet merely collapsed to form – a star. More or less where the former star was. :smack:
I just figured they travelled to another system to drain another star. Just because they don’t show transit doesn’t mean it doesn’t occur nor that it takes no time. I’m pretty sure (but not certain) that nothing contradicted an ability to move. Beyond that, I try not to figure out SW physics.
My big issue was that Solo never had the opportunity to fire Chewie’s bowcaster before? Really?
That’s fine, except they are a few people in the ultimate hostile territory. They have no hope of surviving a huge trek in which, you know, everyone knows who they are and is firing on them. I know stormtroopers can’t hit the side of a barn, but…
Re the state of politics, just because you can, in your mind, connect the dots between RotJ and TFA doesn’t justify the necessity of extrapolating that connection, nor does it make the TFA’s story any damn good. The logic of diehard Star Wars fans seems to be that, if some sort of explanation for a given criticism is remotely plausible, then everything is just fine and the person who made the criticism is an idiot.
The EU canon had already dealt with the defeat and breakup of the Empire in a plausible way, spinning many stories in the process, such as the Grand Admiral Thrawn series, which has a lot of fans. And you get the further adventures of Luke Skywalker as well–you know your already successful main character. (I’m not saying the EU content was perfect, and it does diminish the ostensibly clean ending of RotJ, but it’s not garbage either.)
The reason why the EU content was thrown out seems pretty obvious to me: they wanted to have Ford, Fisher, and Hamill in the new movie, so they couldn’t start with events proximate to RotJ. Thus, they couldn’t avail themselves of the well-hammered politics that were already in place in the EU but had to make up their own.
IMO, Ep. VII should have been about Luke following the events of RotJ with a new actor in the role. There was also plenty of meaty content about Han and Leia ready to go, but instead we get to see them as geezers. A pity.
I’m not suggesting a different movie. I’m saying that battling through the Death Star on foot for any significant distance would be highly unrealistic.
So your gripe with Star Wars is its realism, or lack thereof. Remember, our intrepid heroes were allowed to escape. Grand Moff Tarkin was playing the long con.