If you’re going to try and provide a defense of wikipedia use your own words or if you’re incapable of doing so and would rather post someone else’s argument please find something better, in particular find an author who’s not so ignorant of the subject that he reduces it to “conservatives” complaining about “wikipedia bias” and “left-wingers” complaining about wikipedia bias.
I also have to confess that I nearly pissed myself laughing at idea that rationalwiki has no biases “save towards reason.”
That said, once again, thanks very much for admitting that wikipedia is horrible source to use and should be avoided.
Anyway, I’m done with this hijack. If you wish to continue I’d recommend sparing the other members of this site and take it to the pit.
I think it funny that people are relying on one wiki for claims that the other isn’t biased. Particularly since the first wiki is even less stringent than the one they are trying to prove.
I mean, that very quote purports a conspiracy in the bottom parts. That wiki is becoming more and more woo-filled, and that saddens me.