Dec. 21, 2012 is the beginning of the Age of Aquarius

In Matthew 24:3, Jesus’(74) disciples asked him, “What will be the sign of your return and of the closing of the age?” Some Bible versions wrongly use “end of the world” (KJV) or “end of time”. It’s very important to correct some people’s wrong impression that on December 21, 2012 we will see the “end of the world” or “end of time”. What we, in-fact, will see on 12/21/12 is the end of the Age of Pisces and the beginning of the Age of Aquarius. And yes, the Christ - GOD’s ‘chosen one’ - will have returned and produced the “book/scroll” with the “7 seals” on the cover prophesied in The Revelation 5:1-10:10. :cool:

I will always wonder why people that claim to be christian follow things like astrology. On a more secular point of view, it is also unscientific.

A word, please? The different sized fonts and the various colors aren’t really helping you here. Conversing with others on the message board is not the same as standing on a street corner holding a large cardboard sign. Nobody here is attracted by or impressed by how a post looks-they are impressed by what a post says.

If the song lyrics are true, I’m all for it.

GIGObuster,

Hey! What does that screen name mean?

I AM more than a Christian, I AM Omni-religious and a scientist who has discovered at least 7 paradigm-shifting ‘beyond Einstein theories’. I presented a one-page-paper/poster at the NASA Conference Missions for Exoplanets 2010-2020 in Pasadena, CA April 21-23, 2009 http://exep.jpl.nasa.gov/exep_exoMtgPosters.cfm

You don’t deny that on the winter solstice of this year that a major cosmic alignment is going to happen that only happens every 26,000 years? Do you believe in randomness and ‘coincidences’? Are you an atheist? Do you know anything about science? :frowning:

What’s with the influx of barely coherent, TimeCube-styled gibberish lately?

For a self-proclaimed scientist, the OP’s postings don’t seem real scient so far.

I’ve got to get back to the lab and figure some stuff out. Later!

What’s this have to do with 74???

Dial back the font.

As for the “alignment”, it’s called Precession and it’s no great mystery or cosmic event. Every day’s “alignment” happens only once every 26,000 years. Only, the stars move in the mean time, so it’s never exactly the same twice.

“Earth goes through one such complete precessional cycle in a period of approximately 26,000 years or 1° every 72 years, during which the positions of stars will slowly change in both equatorial coordinates and ecliptic longitude. Over this cycle, Earth’s north axial pole moves from where it is now, within 1° of Polaris, in a circle around the ecliptic pole, with an angular radius of about 23.5 degrees.”

“The precession of Earth’s axis was later explained by Newtonian physics. Being an oblate spheroid, the Earth has a nonspherical shape, bulging outward at the equator. The gravitational tidal forces of the Moon and Sun apply torque to the equator, attempting to pull the equatorial bulge into the plane of the ecliptic, but instead causing it to precess.”

What exactly should I expect to see on the news on Dec. 22, 2012 to demonstrate that this indeed happened?

At least it’s not the age of the Aerostar all over again.

You should keep better count of your paradigm-shifting “beyond Einstein theory” discoveries. “At least 7” is frustratingly vague.

Czarcasm,

Do you have anything to say about the material in the post? I use size 4 of 7 font - it’s a code and I AM far-sighted.

I also take advantage of the other features of this forum. If you don’t like my style of writing, then don’t read it and don’t waste everyone’s times with your complaints about fonts, sizes, colors, smiles, etc. If you don’t like that this forum offers these writing features, take your complaint to the administrator. :smack:

You mean the HAIR lyrics were off by 45 years? Or is 45 years just a long dawning?

Blonde Bear,

I AM a composer(74=C3+O+M13+P16+O+S19+E5+R18). The lyrics to the songs(74) are true and the melody(74) has beauty(74). :wink:

I bust the ones that just plug garbage into good algorithms.

And Busting Makes me feel good!:slight_smile:

Don’t think for a second that we do notice how you are avoiding the point, Astrology **is **contradictory to Judeo-Christian principles.

Astrology is a tricky one. Yes, there is a great deal of what you can call ‘hokum’ surrounding it, but one should be careful against throwing the baby out with the bath water. The daily write ups in the paper? Rubbish of course. But to say that human beings aren’t affected by the movements and changes in the universe around us goes too far in my opinion.

Take the moon for instance, which figures into astrology. The moon clearly influences life on earth to an enormous degree. From control of the tides (and keep in mind we humans are 65% water) to changes in animal behavior (and yes we are animals as well). Then there is the Sun. It cycles through magnetic radiation patterns since its surface is molten and it’s poles rotate faster than it’s equator. The impact of this radiation can be seen in the northern lights and we know that radiation can have dramatic effects on a developing fetus. What’s your sign? Is there something to it…perhaps. So, if we agree that there is some scientific evidence for the sun and moon then could the gravity of nearby planets have an influence as well? What about distant stars? Their effects would be far less than our sun’s but could possibly have some influence.

As someone noted above, the signs of the zodiac relate to the precession of the equinoxes. We know now that it is a result of the earth’s tilted axis, but really the twelve constellations were just markers in the sky chosen by ancients to describe the phenomena they observed but didn’t fully understand. It’s the earliest method of keeping time (or is it just coincidence that your watch has twelve points arranged in a circle?). So, to sum up, while Astrologists and daily columns are BS the ancient pseudo science of astrology is based on observation, and careful observation at that. In many ways it was the forerunner of science and it should be tested not tossed out.

composer: C3+O+M13+P16+O+S19+E5+R18 = 74
songs: S19+O+N14+G7+S19 = 59.
Where are you getting 74 for songs from? Or is the O worth 15 when it is convenient?

Do you still claim to be the author of the “book/scroll” from Revelation 5:1-10:10? If so, can we read the book/scroll now, or do we need to wait?

Could you please repost this in a separate thread? I think it would be a great topic on its own.