Ok. Time to summarize my arguement in hopes of establishing
the ‘the’ link between rape and ‘deception to get laid’.
(preamble of self-clarification in regards to why you should appreciate me =) First I tried to come at it from an absolute that I
felt existed (males cannot be hetero-sexually raped). This was
not meant to mitigate other forms of sexual relationships. I felt,
that as an absolute, this provided an excellent field to articulate
the ethics behind all interactions of this sort.
You can please stop slinging mud about my addressing this only
in the context of hetero-sexual relations! From my point of veiw, being bothered by something already existent is being mad at ‘someone’ for being born; however since the anger is in regards to existence and being born, and they are enjoying themselves and you are not; then the logical conclusion is to exit
your own existence; or to not be angry, as you do actually have the choice at any time to exit existence. How someone could be angry at truth, that which has occurred independant of yourself, boggles my mind. Transexuals have been around much longer than me. Murders have been around much longer than me.
Moral people have been around much longer than me. Logical people… well, we’ll see. Can all these sheep be sheparded, the thoughts wandering aimlessly without axioms?
The axiom I first tried does not hold. Males can be (and are) hetero-sexually raped.
I do however believe there is something VERY strong here in regards to consistency, in that males will be more consistent in regards to the entire selection and solicitation process then females. I find this line to be self-evident to the degree that my odds of walking around town door to door, business to business; “wanna fuck?” will not succeed and most likely land me in jail. This is funny and serious in that males will not put females in jail for this behavior, nor will the female need to wander very far in order to succeed – even WITHOUT any form of surgery, cosmetics or fashionable attire. (ever notice that bars and clubs have “NO SOLICITATION” signs posted? which means
that if I were to succeed at selling my product, I would in effect be violating this contractual agreement with the bar by removing profitable customers – so I can’t use these venues - as that would be false and deceptive practice). I think we can all pretty
much agree on this! This is not rocket science. (note that homosexual and transgender, transvestite individuals will probably be beat up moreso and quicker and land themselves
in jail quicker engaging in this process) A large part of gaming is the act of skirting around
this very precise observation of the imbalance and how it sets systems of hypocrisy as a requirement for sex itself. A person must be a hypocrite when calling someone or something a hypocrite (hypocrisy) in order to be sexually selected - a system reserved virtually exclusive to the female side. If an actual non-hypocritical statement is uttered,
the selection process caves in - and the person is used to bank hypocritical gossip to
achieve a hypocritical partner which agrees. I consider this to be close to absolute; quite
possibly absolute.
Soo… after getting beat up and mauled by males looking to show personality evidence to
get laid, for engaging in this process, landing myself in jail and then getting mauled and
beat up by cops to steal a gossip which is exchanged for sex, I start thinking…
"Hmm… being gay would kick ass - “hey dude, wanna go at it?” “sure dude” “cool” - and
then I realize that it is a guy and the bubble pops.
It seems that the entire process of ‘moving in’ on females does require deception, unless
I use prostitution. I’m too poor to use prostitution though, and being so, never had the
oppotunity to aquire a moral about it that might be absent had I been wealthy at this stage
in my thinking process. However, I concluded that the very act of aquiring money in this
life equally requires deception; which is unacceptable to me as an axiom.
Here is why. Deception requires the use of acting on knowledge to directly gain consent
when consent would not otherwise be given. Nobody actually wants to give me the money!
I’m here! Nobody wants to actually give me the sex! I’m here! In fact, nobody even offers.
If I ask, I get turned down - unless I can show evidence that I know how to decieve people
and aquire a more efficient system for trapping commodity when it comes through the shoot.
Nobody allows this trapping of commodity when they see it, so you build an army and kill
them, hopefully so that nobody will see that either. Existence itself doesn’t seem to give
a rats ass about my appearance or contributions however; it wants me to modify myself in
order to recognize me with the tangible goals I have been provided.
Deception involves two very important ideas to myself.
1.)The knowledge of using knowledge for consent when consent would otherwise not be given
2.)The use of a system which forces consent when consent would otherwise not be given.
Catagory two is the one where sincerity can only be claimed in ignorance. Catagory two is always absent of observing the sophistication of catagory one. A person may think they know that they are using knowledge to gain consent when it would not otherwise be given, however these systems collapse the point
of doing it when enough of catagory two is abstracted and becomes catagory 1.
Both catagories are used to abuse cognitive age variations for personal fulfillment. The excuse for engaging in this behavior, is that the realization of this will not catch up with you until you are outside of the punishment zone. The person you abused
may commit suicide, you may die of natural causes, or you may find yourself in a situation where they can no longer prove the misdeed. Also, you can always claim the sincerity exception from ignorance - stating “we were just kids, we didn’t know what was going on - i sincerely apologize”.
The problem with these scenarios is that not every involved is a child; and yet still retains fundamental need for some type of acceptance or validation. Individuals who can abuse the system, but are not egotistical enough to presume that ‘better them than someone ignorant’ of the process who is still automating the abuse system; will find themselves continuously de-selected from the reward system until the cognitive ages reach that area.
Unfortunately, this typically does not occur until everybody is a wrinkled wrinkle… and the honorable have long since committed suicide from the dispair of this forsaken existence.
The question I posit to both males and females, what if you had to take a hit for truth, in regards to your perception of value in order to reach a consistent conclusion about this topic?
Would you do it, or would you continue the abusive system, intensifying your potency with the better system dynamics explanations; still casting away those individuals who write your
script and yet do not recieve a fraction of your aknowledgement or respect? Does it matter to you that people are dying in your process, as a result of the attitude “deception is acceptable to getting laid”? Can you even look at that, and comprehend the
reality of it, the potency of how it questions you and your purpose - that you must be deceptive and that people who have a greater gift for deception don’t use it, and suffer greatly for that?
I think it also presents a problem in that if you actually start sending the signals that this is proper behavior, you really start to open the door for all these prodogies of bad-assness to truly smear you into the ground during your own thriving fitness cycle.
Your fitness is primarily a result of their inaction and critique of systems that are far too easy to manipulate, yet very difficult to discourage. I feel that those who believe they are toughing it out, would find themselves quite suprized at what happens when everybody acts the way they do. Not being use to being observed so closely for so long without abusing your systems you would in effect get slammed faster than comprehension.
This seems key, as I consider this to be a very fundamental dynamic occurring in regards to deception and consent.
I also consider it an important issue to resolve and not defer, using the one life - and death as an excuse. Hoping that if you put it off, this will not come to light until you have passed and enjoyed the ‘good days’.
I find that the degree of mapping directly correlated to fraud in the same way that sacrifice and faith directly correlate to the act of suicide. People who see futher down the road can see murder and suicide before others, often times before a lifetime will expire.
This seems to zero in on the “one night stand issue”; and what is acceptable. I completely disagree that deception is acceptable.
-Justhink
The critical issue for me is what pain the deception will cause the other person.