Thanks for this sentence. You could have said delusions, but didn’t. Much appreciated. Hope you get your humours balanced soon. (I can refer you to some folks who’ll sell you a zapper–cures everything!)
I really have learned a lot from the posts on this thread, although not all of it is what some of the posters wanted to teach me. I will be away from the net while traveling for a little while, and just wanted to express my appreciation before I temporarily disappear.
It looks like I will have to personally find and collect every single article on DOP that’s ever been published. Most of them won’t be worth much for my purposes. A lot will feature single cases of secondary DOP, undistinguished or imprecisely described mixes of primary and secondary DOP, statements without details to back them up or explain how they were arrived at, etc. And, of course, a lot of broadly descriptive pieces with no actual cases described.
DOP seems to fascinate a certain segment of the medical community, and has generated a large amount of literature given its supposed rarity. Trabert’s literature search of 100 years of describing the illness turned up 1,223 cases total (including all the secondary and poorly described ones). I think he found a couple hundred articles–that’s about an average of one article for every six cases or so. I’m not certain, but that seems like a pretty high ratio. And some of them don’t even report cases actually seen by the authors, just ones they’ve heard about. (I think one of the reasons, at least in earlier decades, was that the subject was relatively easy to publish on–authors could pretty much say anything they wanted, since nobody really had (or has) a good handle on it. “Hey, I had a delusional patient (or maybe two) and she/they did (or did not) get better when I tried this.” And for this they got a citation to add to their CV. Wowie.)
But locating carefully written studies of primary DOP really is very difficult. If anybody knows of any articles that focus on primary DOP and offer reasonably good descriptions of how they ruled out underlying physical or mental illnesses, I would very much appreciate a heads-up. Or even ones that give separate data for the primary vs. the secondary cases. I will be sure to pull those first.
Thanks once again to all who have taken the time to offer opinions, info, etc. I’ll drop back in after my little vaca to see if anything happened here in my absence. And if not, then I’ll drop back in when I have any significant news. In the meantime, good health to all.
Delusionally yours, EH