No, you didn’t. You’re ignorant and unable to form opinions without it being pre-digested by people who are cynically manipulating you for your vote.
What did he quote that’s wrong? I only noticed your stupidity. Please enlighten me and I just might comment.
I’m not the dipshit who bleated a RW media talking point about the administration being overturned by the SCOTUS, and then gaping like a fish when asked to substantiate it. That was you.
That is true; and it is also true that racists make up the GOP base, and that racism plays a very important (though not all-important, for Clinton came in for a milder version of the same) role in their opposition to the Administration.
You can’t read English, either. Lobohan didn’t say anything like what you tried to rebut. You created a false linkage and then called names on the basis of your own imagination.
I have heard of it. Do you contend that Obama can’t do what he did by executive order?
The House wants to scuttle that, to hurt some Mexicans, so that the people who make up the GOP base can grin and giggle at the thought of brown families suffering. That’s the policy goal they’re attempting to achieve.
The sane members of the GOP have to act in a histrionic fashion because anything that smacks of compromise with Obama makes the racist GOP base angry. And because of gerrymandering, the GOP in the 21st century only cares about primaries, which are won by the base.
So, you have no idea what’s going on, and should probably take the effort to learn before mouthing off like you’re in possession of an opinion worth listening to.
You’re stupidly parroting RW media talking points again.
That should have ended the thread right there. Let the GOP propose a clean bill. It will pass, though many Democratic Party members are leery of things named Homeland Security and Patriot Act.
Look, if you need to pay the rent with your roommates, and one of them says, “Hey, I’ll pay my share, but I need you to fellate me while wearing this blond wig.” You not accepting that doesn’t mean you’re against paying rent.
Adding the extra condition is what’s causing the problem. Get rid of the condition, and there is no problem.
But no, the GOP would rater kowtow to their racist overlords than actually fund DHS.
Outside the bubble you live in the GOP will take a major political hit if DHS doesn’t get funding on time. Before debate even started multiple Republicans expressed that funding DHS wasn’t that important. With that and the GOP’s history of willingness to shut down government offices, no one save the few right wing nut jobs like yourself is going to blame the Democrats if this bill doesn’t pass.
Given the history, why should the Democrats give in when they know the Republicans will take the blame if it fails?
IMO the Democrats are being generous to the GOP by agreeing to pass a clean bill. They could easily demand more concessions.
Okay, I’ll bite. From whence do you get the lies and bigotry you spout? Were you born that way, or is it a choice? Frankly, when you sound just like Sean Hannity, we are going to conclude that you either get your opinions from him or you are one of his writers. Maybe your pimp comes into the room and repeats them to you after having them received from his source, that is, Fox News. In any event, if you look like a duck, walk like a duck and quack like a duck, don’t get huffy when we conclude that you are a duck and probably fuck like a duck. Personally I like ducks, particularly in confit.