And apply exactly that reasoning to Hillary’s primary campaign and its wake. Did she do anything to repair (not just mitigate) the rifts she herself caused?
I just re-read her speech from last night. Her backing of Obama is tepid, at best, always cast in the light of “Here’s what I did, and Obama will do the same”. Her direct praise of Obama is non-existent – the closest she came was to say that he understands things: workers vs. energy speculators, new energy technology vs. oil companies, that “the genius of America has always depended on the strength and vitality of the middle class”.
Her criticism of McCain is only faintly more discernable than her praise for Obama (limited to “No way, no how, no McCain” and “…it makes sense that George Bush and John McCain will be together next week in the Twin Cities. Because these days they’re awfully hard to tell apart.”). Nothing direct, all implied by way of contrast with “me, me, ME”.
As I said above, perhaps that was the correct political tactic, if only to get the talking heads to shut the fuck up about the issue (i.e., the rifts she herself created); if so, then I guess she did a mostly admirable job. Perhaps it’ll even work as a setup for the “Clinton catharsis” I’ve been hearing so much about (the aborted roll-call that’s supposed to occur tonight), the idea being that her speech last night was a rational argument presented to irrational people, with tonight being a dissolution of the irrationality via emotional outpouring.
Speaking in political analysis terms (not how I think politics should be): will it work? I doubt it’ll have a huge effect; there’s no cure for the truly irrational. They’ll still be causing ruckus, the storyline will go on. Was it worth it? If it was a manufactured issue, as many seem to think, then no, for it could have been ignored. If it was something that truly needed to be addressed, then…still no. IMHO, a larger payoff (for Democrats) would’ve resulted from promoting unity through sharply worded negativity and explicit contrast with Republicans. Leave the inspiration and message of “change” to the actual candidate.
Either way, I certainly think that Hillary could have easily been much less self-serving simply by throwing in a few (relatively meaningless) “Obama roxxors” and “McCain is teh suxxors” comments.