Where to begin? Maybe with a bit of devils advocating…
George W. Bush is the stupidest president ever.
But the Democratic Party couldn’t get someone to beat him for the 2nd term (1st term election BS call allowed)?
Yes, the contemporary Democratic Party is not capable of beating the stupidest president ever.
Or, (put it any way you want), they couldn’t beat Karl Rove, or Dick Cheney, or Daddy, or the Fundies, etc, etc.
Whatever. Doesn’t make Dems look like strong leaders.
Well, the Democratic Party made some mistakes, I guess.
So, why aren’t there more Democrats busting their own for these mistakes?
It sure as hell isn’t to preserve solidarity. Unless you count the “anyone but Bush” solidarity.
I remember right after 2004, Dems were exploring the possibilities of moving to Canada, or New Zealand. They simply gave up on America because of an election that didn’t go their way.
Of course, most did not leave America. Probably NONE. To be fair, I don’t think these ‘reactionaries’ ever amounted to more than a handful.
Now, the Mid-Term elections are looking promising for the left. Why?
Because of Mark Foley??
Is the Democratic party in the future going to define itself as a strictly reactive party?
2008… Obama vs. Clinton… are you serious? Neither is electable.
There will not be a black man, or a woman winning in 2008. Either could be veep, opening up things down the road. But not President in '08. No way.
Democrats need to wipe the sleep out of their eyes.
They need a strong, clear direction.
Do I think this strong, clear direction will happen? Sure. It will, eventually.
How long will it take? Who knows?
There is too much time, money, emotion, and history to dismiss the Democratic Party. It will rise again.
But right now, it’s filled with dum dums.
Dumber than George W. Bush, that’s for sure.