Democrats and Liberals, Who Do You Want to be the Next Republican President?

[Shodan]

@New_Deal_Democrat

As of this writing, Gallup has Obama’s approval rating at 46%. The unemployment rate is 9.6.%. During the November 1982 election Reagan’s approval rating was 44%. The unemployment rate was 10.8%. Nevertheless, Reagan was reelected by a landslide, and transformed the United States.

Reagan did not run for re-election in 1982.

Regards,
Shodan

[Bryan_Ekers]

@Shodan

@New_Deal_Democrat

As of this writing, Gallup has Obama’s approval rating at 46%. The unemployment rate is 9.6.%. During the November 1982 election Reagan’s approval rating was 44%. The unemployment rate was 10.8%. Nevertheless, Reagan was reelected by a landslide, and transformed the United States.

Reagan did not run for re-election in 1982.

Regards,
Shodan

No, you didn’t “regard”; you utterly missed his point. He was comparing the numbers at Reagan’s first midterm to what is now Obama’s first (possibly last, if he loses in 2012) midterm. Reagan had worse numbers and won firmly in 1984, so numbers alone are no gauarantee.

[Diogenes_the_Cynic]

Clinton also lost both houses of Congress during his first midterm in '94, yet handily beat Dole for reelection in '96.

[Der_Trihs]

@Chronos

While it can be viscerally satisfying to see someone like Palin squashed like a bug (as I believe she would be, if she went up against Obama), intellectually, I think it’s best for the country overall if each side puts their best candidate forward.

There’s also the danger that the candidate you think will be squashed like a bug will actually win. If Bush II can get into the Presidency then any moron can if he or she has the right connections.

[SteveG1]

@Der_Trihs

There’s also the danger that the candidate you think will be squashed like a bug will actually win. If Bush II can get into the Presidency then any moron can if he or she has the right connections.

And that’s pretty damn scary.