Rove, again?! Lord Og, how I detest that soft and portly chunk of self-righteous smarm, the Pillsbury Deathboy.
Now, Universe, I know I haven’t been a very good pantheist, but if you have a spare lightning bolt lying about, or a plague of boils…
He was speaking metaphorically about the general attitude of liberals.
You are really grasping when someone has to point metaphor out to you when you are trying to pin someone down.
Dean, loser of the primaries, gets a promotion to head of DNC. BRILLIANT!
With tactics like that, Rove could take a nap until next election and still roll over you guys.
There’s no guarantee that Rove will be around for the next election. Should a moderate get the Republican nomination, look for Rove to be benched.
Poor fellow needs his naps. Every time he sleeps, he dreams of the current poll numbers, and wakes up screaming…
And this from the estimable phone sex afficianado, Bill O’Reilly…
If this be treason, make the most of it. - Patrick Henry
[QUOTE=BobLibDem]
Just show me one reputable cite where anyone recommended getting therapy for the 9/11 attackers.
[QUOTE]
As newscrasher points out, this statement was more about the general attitude of liberals than something that should be taken literally.
However, if you must have a cite:
Post #110 in this thread, dumbass.
As newscrasher points out, this statement was more about the general attitude of liberals than something that should be taken literally.
However, if you must have a cite:
Post #110 in this thread, dumbass.
Cite for anything reflecting that “general attitude”? Or are you, like Rove, spreading an opponent’s caricature of something of which you have no direct knowledge?
Cite?
newcrasher, you are precisely the sort of lying scum I spoke of earlier. You manipulate the words of others to “prove” your own preconceptions. You justify away the evil actions of others and dismiss valid comparisons with your manipulations. Swine such as you are destroying the country I love with your warped conception of what it means to love your country. It does not mean that you should jump through hoops to justify any actions by your political party, no matter how perverted. Sometimes to love means you must stand up and say, “What you are doing is wrong!”
You and your fellows are not patriots nor, for that matter, good Republicans or good conservatives. You have thrown away the values you claim to hold in order to support actions we used to only associate with totalitarian regimes. And what did you gain from this? Are you more secure, now that stories and photos leaked from your concentration camps “prove” to people around the world that the United States is, indeed, as bad as they were told and make recruiting more terrorists child’s play? Does that make our soldiers safer or the job of rebuilding Iraq and Afghanistan easier? No, it does not, and it is only because you have chosen to ignore facts that you do not see that. I no longer give you and your kind the credit of being obtuse. No, it has gone past the point where it can be explained by your being lazy and stupid. I now believe you and Rove and Bush are actually malicious.
Do yourself and your immortal soul a favor and grow a conscience.
You need a cite? How did you manage to miss it?
dropzone: You’re a nut.
By all means keep it up, though. For every wacko liberal shrieking at the top of his lungs about concentration camps and totalitarian regimes you guys lose votes come election day.
It shouldn’t be that hard. If O’Reilly truly said that, then you should be able to prove it. There are after all dozens of left wing web sites devoted to finding and publishing quotes that might embarrass him.
How did you manage to miss elucidator saying that that’s what Bush should have done with a Gitmo prisoner who did go mad? Not a 9/11 hijacker. No connection, sabe?
Do you have a cite for the claim about “liberals’ general attitude”, or are you willing to admit you’re making shit up again?
I’d rather be thought crazy for screaming against the utter destruction of our international reputation, goodwill, and general love of freedom and liberty than be thought to be in placid agreement with that destruction.
Who was it that said “Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice”? Oh, yeah…that was one of yours, back when the Right had an actual soul and stood for something other than “Win this election at all costs, no matter who or what we have to bulldoze and ruin to do it”…
LEFT WING SITES?!?!? Christ, it was EVERYWHERE! He did everything short of talking about it with Dr Phil.
Okay, NPR and, I assume, Fox Cable News ignored it, but it was even on my local Fox affiliate.
Oh now this is just silly.
He was giving his impression of the liberal attitude. You guys just have to fight this on a level of parsing words? You know there is no call for a cite here.
So does this apply to our holding of prisoner’s who may threaten not just our liberty, but our very lives, and the lives of our soldiers?
He can speak for himself. If, in fact, he was asserting his “impression” as fact. Out of ignorance. Which we’re here to fight. That isn’t silly, schmuck.