Which of these witnessesclaim to have run towards the grassy knoll?
And how you account for the fact that Kennedy was struck from behind, not from the grassy knoll?
Regards,
Shodan
Your stupid theory, so you provide the evidence to support it.
BTW, you don’t win just because people get tired of your nonsense and go away shaking their heads.
Truth be told, I vaguely recall some accounts that described witnesses thinking shots were coming from the knoll, but if there was a shooter there, he must’ve completely missed since there’s no indication his bullet(s) hit anything. Maybe there was a firecracker enthusiast on the grassy knoll.
BTW, here is a picture of the infamous grassy knoll. Please point out where the gunman/gunmen could possibly hide and not be seen by everyone else that was there.
He’s… uh… behind the fence, there. Crouched down real low. Maybe in a foxhole he quickly filled in before escaping. Look over there - Johnson is getting sworn in and I bet he had something to do with it!
Someone is shooting from over there. Come on, everybody - let’s charge him! Maybe someone will take our picture!
Regards,
Shodan
Analysis of a dictabelt recording in Dallas by two independent scientific studies persuaded the HSCA that there was a probable conspiracy in the murder because it was shown that echo correlation indicated at least one shot from the so-called ‘Grassy Knoll’ location.
The simplest explanation for the correlation between the impulses recorded on the tape and the geometry of Dealey Plaza and the images recorded by amateur films of the murder is that there was a shot from that location.
Is that a fact? Is this based on striations on bullets recovered during an autopsy?
I may have expressed my point inelegantly. The impulses on the dictabelt were found to be consistent with films of the murder, the simplest explanation of which is that the recording is a genuine recording of the crime and that the shot that threw Kennedy back came from the front.
Yes, I have seen the McAdams site before.
Regards,
Proudfootz
I have literally provided as much evidence for my hypothesis as you have of yours. Arguably more, as you have not even presented a coherent thesis.
Just another boring, banal, run-of-the-mill conspiracy theory. Depressing. I would love to see something new, something with a little effort behind it.
.
There’s also such a thing as echoes. Different witnesses heard varying numbers of shots for that reason.
Next time you see it, try reading it.
Are you familiar with subsequent investigations into the Dictabelt recording?
I have supported my contentions.
No, your pretense that I haven’t doesn’t count.
I should have guessed that was it. You might want to read up on the evidence.
Examination of the bullet, including neutron activation analysis.
Regards,
Shodan
Here’s a clue for you: Shodan and I are agreeing with each other.
Not your decision to make.
Is that a list of the people photographed rushing to the location where these witnesses believe there was a shooter?
If you read my posts more carefully, you will notice that I mention the evidence indicates at least one shoot from behind the limousine.
When the audio from the shot in front is matched to the film, it is apparent Kennedy was struck at that moment.
Still waiting for the photographs of multiple people rushing towards the grassy knoll in pursuit of a shooter in front of the limousine.
Regards,
Shodan
Yes, I am very much aware there have been some efforts to try and debunk it.
In the end I tend to trust the scientific findings regarding the geometry and timing of the shots by the top experts in the field of forensic acoustics over revisionists.
No, that was what you were going to produce. I just gave you a list of other witnesses, in case they matched what you said.
So all the multiple shooters fired at exactly the same instant, but only Oswald hit Kennedy? Is that your theory?
Regards,
Shodan
Who are these top experts?