Did Castro Have JFK Killed?

The National Academy of Sciences’ experts aren’t top experts? Peer-reviewed scientific journalists aren’t credible?

I have read up on the evidence, which is why I have made the considered judgement I have.

What is it you think about the neutron activation analysis that links a bullet fragment to one and only one weapon to the exclusion of all others?

You do know that different weapons can fire bullets from the same ammo box, right?

So you believe this -

Good, we are making progress.

Still hoping for those photographs.

Regards,
Shodan

Regards,

Proudfootz

I see. So you just wanted me to compare your random list to a list you wanted me to produce.

The evidence indicates ate least one shooter from the so-called ‘Grassy Knoll’ area did strike Kennedy.

No need for a theory.

JFK conspiracy theory discussions are truly like whack-a-mole.

Just when you think the nation has turned the corner, someone comes out the woodwork like they’ve been in a time warp since 1964 with a conspiracy theory again. Whack one, and another one takes it’s place over here.

You’d think over 50 years of thoughtful research, computer simulation, discovery, books, TV specials, and a complete lack of evidence supporting any conspiracy theory, these people would die off. But no.

I’d bet $100 proudfootz thinks the govm’t blew up the WTC, but I don’t have the energy to ask.

“The witnesses chasing up the grassy knoll, chasing the assassin”
People were running all over the place. Who were these witnesses? Let me see their statements saying they were witnesses, and that they were chasing someone.
Your “evidence”, without those statements, is crap.

McAdams is probably the single best website out there for information, but just for the hell of it, I’ll add this one. Dale Myers has created several computer models based on evidence showing Oswald acted alone. He also goes into other “theories,” such as “Badge Man,” and shows there’s nothing there. Excellent information from both sites, in my opinion.

And they always bring up theories that have been debunked many times before. What is their reasoning? “But I’M making the claim this time, so you have to start the process all over again!”
Hey, proudfootz-Been there, done that, read the book, saw the movie, saw the stage play based on the movie, ate the limited edition cereal, got the bobbleheads, and bought the promotional glasses at Burger King.
Got something new to bring to the table? If not…you are just boring me.

Wow - you still don’t know anything about the case? :smack:

A team from Bolt, Beranek and Newman (the same guys who investigated the Kent Stae massacre) were appointed as experts by the HSCA on the recommendation of the Acoustical Society of America. Further study by Weiss and Aschkenasy confirmed the findings.

Dale Myers isn’t above fudging the facts to try and make his theories seem more credible.

http://www.patspeer.com/chapter12c%3Aanimania

In the end, too much twisting of known facts is required to make his nonsense ‘work’.

Your repeated and unsubstantiated clams that anything I’ve written has been ‘debunked’ by someone, somewhere, sometime is what’s boring.

There seem to be differing attitudes toward the HSCA.

What specifically are you trying to say with that link? It’s a very long article. Is there something in particular you want us to know about it?

What evidence is that? The Dictabelt thing is fairly well debunked. Both the shots that hit Kennedy and Connally came from behind. What evidence do you mean?

Regards,
Shodan

You’re not kidding anyone here - we all know, and you know we know, about how that analysis was followed up by a giant “nevermind,” just a few months later, when it was conclusively determined that the recording happened well after the assassination. Why are you ignoring it?

The blurry video showing everyone running around, with the narrator claiming that two of them were witnesses and that they were chasing the supposed gunman.
Do try to keep up, old chap.

It is a discussion about Dale Myers and his methods.

In it we are shown how Myers moves wounds around on Kennedy’s body to try and make his theory work. Apparently, such chicanery is convincing to some people.

If this discussion is too detailed I suggest people stop asking for citations.

Top. Experts.

Who paid you to say that?

Regards,
Shodan