I know Cayce gave thousands of readings, and these are archived by some organization that survived him.
I also know he got a lot of things wrong, and it’s probable he’d get some things right (if only by chance.)
But despite all that’s been written and said about him, I wonder if it’s possible to document his getting anything right.
I mean, were any of his predictions actually published at the time they were allegedly given?
He’s said to have predicted the 1929 stock market crash, the discovery of the dead sea scrolls, and the independence of India, but is it possible to document his predicting any of these things before they happened?
Is it just as possible that the organization in charge of these readings simply manufactures alleged fulfillment?
I mean, it would be interesting if the readings that “predicted” the discovery of the dead sea scrolls were published only after their discovery.
And it would be interesting if the readings that predicted the independence of India were published only after the British pulled out.
Wow, what an amazing prediction to make in 1934. A year after Hitler became Chancellor of Germany in 1933.
And predicting in 1935 Hitler would not voluntarily step down from power? Okay, technically, that’s a future prediction but come on.
Here’s my psychic prediction: Kim Jong-un will not voluntarily step down from power either. So now if he gets overthrown or forced out by a war, you can say the Amazing Nemo predicted it back in 2013.
He apparently was quite proficient at metabolizing both carbon and oxygen for the better part of sixty-seven years, so it could be argued he pretty much got those things right…
Frankly, the longevity of this “prophet” is amazing. His medical “cures” are ridiculous (inhaling brandy fumes to cure tuberculosis), his mutterings about “Atlantis” absurd.
Martin Gardner did a nice article on him-yet people still buy and read this crap-why?