Did H.S. teacher screw up by allowing student to give KKK historical perspective?

Per this story is the parent being too sensitive or is the teacher giving students too much leeway in this exercise? Would a student dressed as Hitler and justifying the Third Reich as a historical perspective exercise be a good history lesson, or a crassly insensitive slap in the face to Jewish students?

Teacher learns lesson from ‘Klan’ incident

Maybe I missed something, but did the black student have a problem with it, or was he okay and his father freaked out? Parents can be hyper-sensitive to things their kids shrug off - such was the case with a health texbook used when I was in high school (the issues was it had a chapter on sex and reporduction, which half the class didn’t read anyway).

I thought the student giving the report handled it well by stating from the get-go that he didn’t buy what Evans was selling.

Patty

Without more detail, I don’t have any problem with the teacher’s basic approach. I think presenting the perspective of the Klan could be really useful–and Evans was a powerful figure for a period in the 1920s. I would not want Evans’s words to be delivered with no context and with no chance for challenge or rebuttal. Since the teacher reviewed the character selection before the presentations, he should have had ample time to provide context.

However, barring evidence that the Klan position was put forth as a good thing, I put the reaction to the presentation in the same class that I put opposing The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn because it includes the word nigger. (Classes in which the students are called upon to read aloud the parts in Huck Finn which I find odd for those grades, anyway where some poor black kid is singled out to “be” Jim can create bad situations, but banning Huckleberry Finn is stupid.)

So it was only the imagery that Wilson’s parents objected to? At least they weren’t trying to stifle history itself with their objections. I wonder what their reaction to a mere photo of a Klansman would have been?

It might be tough for Vanzant to evaluate each student’s choice and decide if it’s going to offend even one student or their families. He’d have to know the cultural/ethnic background of all of his students and their parents as well as their sensitivity levels on each historical subject. A daunting task indeed.

While I agree that researching a period costume can be very informational for the student, perhaps just photos or drawings depicting their subjects would suffice (might be cheaper for the student as well). It might be the safe bet for any history teacher in this highly charged PC day and age.

If a student cannot see this material in a classroom, and see for him/her self that it is bullshit, and why it is bullshit, then what will happen when that student is faced with it in real life? Are we to send students into the world totally unprepared? What would the parents have teachers do? Not present such material in realistic situations? What happens then, when students meet a “sympathetic skinhead?” Is it any wonder that students, without meeting such material and discussing it, and figuring out why it is bullshit, are being seduced, and Nazism is on the rise?

Parents who are offended by this are shooting themselves in the foot. Students must be exposed to such material, to understand why it is bad on its face.

When my son was in highschool he prepared a presentation on the recruitment methods of the KKK. He had shared what he was doing with me while he wrote it and it was bloody fascinating. I got the impression that hearing something like that would forewarn likely recruits how these groups/gangs go about it.