Wife takes '96 Accord to place to a repair place (that focuses on tires, but does general work also) to get an oil change. She drops it off, I pick it up. When I pick it up, Repair Shop Guy (RSG) says there’s a quote for muffler replacement and for a radiator flush. I assume my wife has asked for the exhaust quote (as it has become a little louder recently), and the flush was upselling.
I get into the car and it is louder by orders of magnitude. When I get it home, my wife says it was OK when she turned it in. Also, the car is spewing engine coolant. (We are 95% certain this started after being in their posession as the leak was severe and readily apparent.)
We go back to the place to complain that two problems started (or at least were worsened) while in their posession. RSG claims that there is no way that the procedure (including lifting the car) could have damaged the exhaust system and that it was quite rusted.
RSG puts the car on the auto lift, and we inspect the exhaust system, and there was rust in several spots. The hole seemed to be at the junction with a hangar, and the rusted pipe there collapsed. They located the source of the coolant leak, which was in the radiator itself (they pointed it out, but I could not see it). They attribute both to corrosion.
At this point we’re somewhat satisfied it was either chance that these happened together or that the corrosion was bad enough that even maintenance hastened the failure.
On further thought, it seemed too much of a coincidence that :
–two failures happened while in their posession.
–they supplied two quotes, without prompting, both related to the immediate problems.
–when confronted with the problem, especially the exhaust problem, the RSG immediately claims that it wasn’t their work, but instead the corrosion. How did he know? Why did he assert that an inspection would reveal the cause to be the corrosion, instead of suggesting lifting the car to diagnose?
On the other hand, they didn’t hard sell the other repairs. They just said there were quotes attached. Would they have broken things that we might or might not have brought back there to fix? If they wanted extra repairs, wouldn’t they break something immediate, then call and say “Holy crap! Your brake fluid is leaking. You’ll be lucky to make it home alive. You want us to fix it?”
We elected to take the car to another repair place to fix these problems, and we’ll ask them to look for signs of shop-caused damage (especially to the radiator – the exhaust system looks like typical corrosion, so it will be hard to tell if someone “helped” it break through).
So, do you think the repair place did the damage? If so, on purpose? Or did they have the bad luck of both problems occuring while they were in posession?