I’m can’t figure this riddle out, so I guess I’ll ask for any ideas anyone has. First the riddle, then some hints I’ve gleaned from the poser of the riddle.
One for the front,
Two for the back.
You will never need three.
This I know from the riddle-poser:
You do not need any specialized knowledge to know the answer.
The answer is satisfying. It is not a bad riddle (I believe him on this).
The answer is not “going to the bathroom”. I asked that and he said it wasn’t it, though he liked my response.
The word “for” is specifically important. He said that the riddle does not work if you substitute “in”, for example. “for” matters.
You could have three or more, you just won’t need that many (while you certainly could need one or two). Hence the answer is not a tricycle or a wheelbarrow.
I have no idea whether the answer is something concrete (like “a jar”) or something abstract (like “love”).
I’m guessing the reason why “for” is important is because you can also use it as the number “four” but that doesn’t really help me. Thought I’d suggest that hint. I’m no good with riddles.
Then the chicken eats the seed. Take the chicken over first.
Unless they were also going to St. Ives. They may have stopped on the road or were traveling slowly and the guy overtook them, in which case 2,753 are going to St. Ives (2,802 if you count the 49 sacks).
One in the front, and two to form the notch at the rear. You can mount sights all over the gun if you want to, but you’ll never need more than three protrusions to aim the gun.
Mirrors. You use one to view your front. To view your back you need two, one facing your back and the other to see that mirror. You should never need three.