I learned about a new type of sex act last night. I think it only exists as a joke/meme, as I’m not quite sure it’s even humanly possible. Hence the question. And do note that at this point I’m merely adding in some filler text so the question doesn’t appear on preview.
The title of the sex act: Halifax Fudge Badger. The Urban Dictionary definition seems to require that at least one participant be Canadian and use Moosehead Lager as a lubricant, but that seems to me to be part of the joke. Anyway, go to Urban Dictionary and look it up, I’m not going to link to it.
The question: Is it humanly possible for one person to defecate directly into another person’s rectum, as suggested by the UD definition? By my math, the “top,” as it were, would have to have an exceptionally solid, and tube-shaped, stool in order to have even a remote chance of pulling this off. And the “bottom,” as it were, would have to have pretty exceptional control of his/her anal muscles in order to “receive”?
Is this humanly possible? Are there documented cases of it having been done successfully?
Urban Dictionary is basically the immature 13-year-old boy’s dictionary, where literally everything is twisted into some bizarre sex act. It’s not meant to be taken seriously. I assure you whoever wrote that has likely never actually touched a member of the opposite sex.
That’s not (if it even exists) a “sex act”. It is a depraved act of some emotionally diseased human-like individual who would be best served by euthanasia.
Goodness gracious @Jasmine. That’s quite something for FQ.
I’ll go with @Dark_Sponge FTW. Some people have remarkably … open … rectums. I’m told that video documentaries of such are readily available on this interwebs thingie.
If the opening is big enough, even rather runny stool will slide / blorp / drip right in.
And for the folks not well-versed in human sexual paraphilias, interest in both pee and poo play is actually rather common. See Urolagnia - Wikipedia & Coprophilia - Wikipedia for more. Delivered in their usual dry almost SFW style.
ETA: ref @mixdenny just below:
Good God, man! Have you no decency!??!!1!?
And here I thought this was going to be about squidding. To LSL: LOL!
Many decades ago someone brought a disgusting sex novel into work to share. It was about lots of anal centered, uh, activities. The title was something like “The Adventures of Prissy Poon”. One line was so memorable I still recall it, “My asshole winked like the eye of a bullfrog in a rainstorm”. That’s some good porn writing!
Professional comics classify certain jokes as street jokes. The kind of jokes with no clear origin that friends tell each other. No comic has ownership of street jokes. There is an entire category of street jokes about giving funny names to bizarre and unlikely sex acts. Don’t waste time trying to figure out if they are real or possible. It’s a joke.
Does anyone remember canadiansexactsdotorg from How I Met Your Mother?(I’m not putting in a link because when I tried to pull it up I got screaming alerts not to surf there.)
A former girlfriend once showed me a movie on VHS. It was titled Depth Charge. The credits made it clear it was some kind of men only porn. This did not surprise me. She liked to watch such movies. They were not my thing. But, I would rather sit through one than have to watch Gone With The Wind, Far And Away, or Pretty Woman- as I had to with other girlfriends.
The video was dedicated entirely to showing how far various performers could fit their arm up the anus of various other performers. The vague answer- a lot farther than you would think.
I have spoilered the stand out scene. Read it if you dare.
It was a man clapping. He had one hand on the outside of another man’s navel. His other hand, the outline clearly visible. was on behind the man’s navel- inside his abdomen.
I am no medical professional, but I’m going to guess that the answer to the OP’s question is yes, but it depends on 1) how hard and suitable-shaped the stool is and 2) the relative stretchability of the two anuses in question. I think the OP answered his own question. Of course, let’s hope nobody ever puts the theory to real-life test.
Anal anatomy is surprisingly complex. There are actually two sphincters there, an internal one and an external one. The external one is under voluntary control, and the internal one is involuntary. Your bladder has the same two-sphincter arrangement. When you voluntarily relax your external bladder sphincter as if to pee, your external anal sphincter also relaxes; when you’re fighting to hold back urine or feces, you are voluntarily clenching these external sphincters.
The internal sphincter of the bladder (and that of the anus) is normally closed. When subjected to enough pressure for enough time (due, respectively, to the accumulation of urine or feces), the internal sphincter relaxes, and that’s when you have to consciously hold your external sphincters closed as you head for the bathroom.
That internal anal sphincter, being clenched most of the time, tends to cause a rather severe pain response when penetrated with anything much larger than a finger. That is, unless you can convince it to relax first. You can do this with sustained gentle pressure from the outside by something larger than a finger; the internal sphincter will eventually relax just as if there were feces pushing against it from the inside. The neat part is that once it relaxes, it will remain in its relaxed state for some time, providing a window (literally and figuratively) for penetration.
So…in the case of the Halifax Fudge Badger, the receiving partner would need to get their internal anal sphincter to relax before beginning the transfer. Doing so would ensure that the giving partner doesn’t have to push so hard, reducing the compressive stresses on the stool that might otherwise cause it to deform, and thus increasing the chances of a successful transfer. This isn’t something I’ve tried or have any interest in, but it certainly seems like it would be possible.
Hey, it’s not my cuppa tea either, but I try not to judge. It is in fact the knowledge that there are people out there who have a tendency to cast such judgments that makes it very difficult for some young people to come to terms with whatever uncommon sexual predilections they develop as they grow up.
If you read/look around on the internet, you might be really, really surprised at what some people do for sexual pleasure. The links that @LSLGuy provided in the post below yours are just barely scratching the surface.
On a related note, I want to point out that fecal transplant therapy - putting someone’s poop into another person’s intestines - is very much a medical procedure that is performed in real life. The act that the OP is referring to is kind of a sexual version of that medical procedure, just done so with much less care, effectiveness, and nowhere as deep into the guts.
