::camera POV rises upward from Elendil’s Heir, dropped to his knees in anguish, clenched fists raised in the air in supplication::
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!
I kinda liked the last one, with the loose pants. For work.
The whole “sexy” part of the story was about Marc Jacobs, and most of the pictures were from other designers’ collections. Kind of a messy presentation but I’d have to see his collection before I judged. I didn’t quite get the part about tweed skirts with see-through panels to show your knickers being either particularly sexy or respectful (which the article said) though. Again, I’d have to see it, I suppose.
I once had an oversized football jersey like that when I was a teen. I probably had hair that frizzy, too. Wonder if I was just before my time?
None of the outfits or the women (those “celebs”! ugh!) were sexy to me. Blech.
Surely they got the pictures of the best and worst dressed mixed up. Those cannot possibly, by anyone’s standards, be the* best* dressed. Wow, that was awful. There was one woman in a white dress in the middle of the slide show that looked good, the rest were awful.
And that “just got out of bed hair” takes about 2-3 hours of styling from what I read on jezebel.com . They talked to a hairstylist who told them that the “natural look” took almost more work than any other hairstyle at the show and then about 10 minutes before the show the designer breezed in and informed the stylists that he preferred the hair to be more styled and less natural.
Did anyone get a look at Marc Jacobs new shoes? The ones with the high heels placed directly under the ball of the foot? It’s obvious he was trying to make a statement but still…WTF?
I just don’t get high fashion.
You’re not supposed to “get” it - you’re supposed to…uh, wait a minute, I can figure this one out…you’re supposed to…spend a lot of money?