Do I have to restrain myself?

  1. There’s a hip crowd? If so, how can I get “in” with them, if you know what I’m saying? I believe I have extreme cred build-up, mostly around the gums.
  2. This is true. Once you have 2000 posts, you can start threads titled “I hate black people” and everyone will come in and agree with you.
  3. I wish I was smart and witty, so I at least had the second choice. As a slack-jawed yokel, I only had one option: Stranger! Bad!
  4. I don’t need to post on a message board to mark out my territory. That’s what urine is for.
  5. This is also true. I for one deeply respect people with the courage to get all up in my face on an anonymous message board. It’s a quality which is all-too-rare on today’s Internet.

Absolutely. Heck, go ahead and stick my sig in there with it, if you want. What’s mine is yours.

Q: how many feminists does it take to screw in a light bulb?

A: that’s not funny!!!

Maybe YOU are on the wrong message board. There are plenty of places with trolls just waiting to drag you to the ground. Why pick a message board that frowns on it?

A) Because bottom of the barrel is still an accomplishment.

And I just played right into your hands didn’t I? :wally

Sensualips…signing out…

Don’t feel bad. In a hundred years, we’ll both be dead.

Wait, now I feel bad.

Wow, that’s a scientific study. :rolleyes:
Maybe you should get out more. I interact with a good number of Bush supporters who don’t have this philosphy.

Well, if they become a stable democracy that cracks down on democracy, their influence will spread to surrounding nations. Despots will be less likely to allow terrorism for fear of ending up like Saddam while the populace may see success in Iraq and work toward similar democracies that will allow them greater freedoms.

What are you, 12? Good god, even Sensualips doesn’t make leaps of illogic like this. Ask one of your teachers about how hypotheses and theories work in recognized studies. They require some data, of which you have precious little.

I don’t even have any sisters for christsakes.

Who the hell said it was a scientific study. I sure didn’t. I’m telling from my obesrvations, they’re all fucking stupid, ignorant people. According to you, they’re not. No one is more right then the other here.

This must be the angeldust talking. This is totally serperated from reality.

Don’t need to, I’m fully aware of how they work. Anything else?

I can spare a couple if you like. I have six.

Really? Have they grown out of the bratty stage? I almost had a sister-in-law but my brother blew that one for me.

Well, you see, even the ones in their 40s are still bratty. That’s why I’m willing to give some away.

Wow, then reality enters. C’mon bigot boy, explain how that remark is based upon ‘your observations’.

Dude, with your grammar and spelling, I’d think twice before tossing out those drug-use accusations.

Ufff. Well in that case, I’ll just deal with my daughter. Only 18 more years and she can go away to college. Only 18 more years…

Believe me, lady, you ain’t the only one.

Ummm, ok, it’s pretty simple. As you’ve heard me mention before, all of the Bush supporters (not repubs mind you) I’ve met come off as stupid. When Bush gets re-elected and destroys the world*, who gets the blame?

Do you need a pop-up book to make it clearer for you?

That’s it? That’s all you got? How about responding to my allegation that your vision for Iraq is never going to happen?

[sub]*I don’t think he’s going to destroy the world, but you’re so fucking stupid you might misinterpret my embellishment.[/sub]

You back pedal better then Pele. Okay, you’re in college, time to learn some critical thinking skills…

Okay, now look at this phrase. Unlike some of your others, you have yet to ammend this one. Note how you define the ‘morons’ as “anyone who voted for Bush in 2004”. Note there are no conditional modifiers here, such as ‘out of the people I’ve interact with’. So you are including all of those who voted for Bush as being morons. Just beacuse they don’t share your political bent. Wow. That sure is enlightened. So it appears that you are basing your opinion of all Bush supporters from the few that you’ve met. Not exactly an educated view point.

Wow, that was creative. Who’d you steal that from?

Respond to what? There was absolutely no substance to your rebuttal.

Besides, you still don’t get it. This thread isn’t about whether or not Bush’s policies or views are correct or will be correct. It’s about realizing that others have differing view points and bashing them based soley upon who they support with no knowledge or why or what they think is an ignorant way to think. It is quite possible to support Bush and see why others would support Kerry and his proposals and vice versa.

Again with the chracter attacks rather than actually making any substantial arguement. You remind me a lot of myself when I was an undergrad. Thinking the slivers of knowledge I had gained made me smarter than most anyone, refusing to believe I couldn’t be wrong. But I grew out of it. I hope that someday you’ll realize that you don’t have to hate another person just because you disagree with them.

There’s not much to respond to, so we’ll start here.

Nope the omission is intentional.

Remember how we all said there wasn’t any WMD? Well now we’re saying this. It’ll become clear to you in about 20 years.

I’m saying anyone who has been lied to and suckered and comes back for more is a fucking moron. That scenario just happens to be applicable to certain parties and politicians at the moment.

Normally I’d agree. The difference is I think Bush is soooo bad for our country he’s unique from history. Bush has a few issues that I can understand people supporting him for, but his flaws totally outweigh them. I don’t understand why people don’t come to the same conclusion. I find the admin spin on things to be pathetic. 4 years ago this guy was talking about how he’s not going to nation build, and now he’s talking about “spreading liberty around the world”? I seriously question the mental processes of anyone that won’t even stop to think about what’s really going on.

I don’t hate them because they disagree with me. I hate them because they’re electing morons who don’t know the first thing about fighting terror. (for example we’re fighting terrorists not terror) I hate them because they’re electing morons who are turning the world away from us. I hate them because they’re electing morons…etc, etc.

Mmmhmm, did you perchance note the part where I stated that this was merely my opinion of the human/psychological aspect? And that I admittedly had little military strategy knowledge? And that I was only answering a very small question/statement on World Eater’s part, not solving the whole war?

Sheesh.

World Eater:

silensus:

At the risk of being labeled a “dittohead”…

Maybe World Eater thinks that because that’s how pundits like Jon Stewart and Bill Maher portay Bush supporters and anyone who’s voted for him.

FWIW, I voted Bush in 2000, I will NOT vote Bush in 2004, and I will never vote for John Kerry.

BTW, stately plump buck mulligan, for fresh-baked cookies, I’d put a Kerry/Edwards sticker on my lawn. I am such a sugar whore. :rolleyes:

Sensuallips: you’ve been spanked, baby. Suck it up, bow and scrape, live and learn.

In direct answer to your OP: We wouldn’t be able to make as much fun of you if you did.

Hey Giraffe, I got yer fuckin’ sig right here, pal. <Thrusty!>