In my 20s I worked in a seafood restaurant (you probably would recognize the initials, Guin it was the G.C).
Anyway, broiled lobster was one of the dishes I prepared. It involved grabbing two live lobsters and quickly cutting each one in half, right down the midline. Three halves were placed, cut surface facing up, on a metal plate and put into the broiler, basting with butter periodically until done.
But, they continued to move around for some time after being cut in half. It was a constant struggle to keep the claws from burning as the moved toward the flame.
This is very much like the questions about medical procedures done under the influence of amnesiacs. Would you be reassured by knowing that the thing that’s about to be done will be painful as hell, but when it’s all over, you won’t remember a thing? Dreams are the same way – by nature’s design very quickly forgotten if you wake up during one, and typically not recalled at all if you wake up later. But even with dreams, would anyone comfortably go to sleep knowing that they’re going to have a genuinely terrifying nightmare, but hey, you won’t remember it when you awaken?
This Dr. Rose seems confused to the point of being downright unethical.
I was gonna say apparently davidm has never been to a New England crab boil.
Getting back to lobsters, ages ago – so long ago it might have been Graham Kerr – a TV chef advocated putting the lobster in cold water then turning on the heat. Like the old “boil a frog” parable, the slowly rising heat lulls it to sleep before the temperature rises to fatal levels. He claimed besides being more humane, it led to more tender meat; you didn’t get that reflexive tense-up at the moment of death.
I can see why a busy lobster house might not want take the trouble but on the surface, it makes sense to me.