Yeah, I think there’s roughly zero chance that Trump would issue an executive order which read “All Muslims including U.S. troops are banned from entering the U.S.”
But I do find myself having to revise upward somewhat my estimate of the odds that Trump would issue an executive order reading “All Muslims are banned from entering the U.S.” without bothering to consider that this could be interpreted to include U.S. troops.
That’s pretty vague. To what, specifically, are you saying the “everyone” would defer to the CiC? Putting Muslims in concentration camps as the Japanese were during WWII?
Well, because it did mean that. Interpreting “total and complete shutdown” to mean a total and complete shutdown is an easily-defensible interpretation, surely?
If I may interpret your position for a moment, are you perhaps trying to say that what Trump said was, on the face of it, so preposterous, so outrageous, that reasonably people should have understood that he did not, in fact, intend to do what he said he would do?
I can’t speak for John Mace of course, but in my opinion, it’s not that it’s too outrageous for Trump, I just don’t think that interpretation lines up with his black-and-white worldview. In Trump’s mind, Muslims are bad, but"the troops" are good. (But anyone who says anything bad about Trump is the worst, and this supersedes all the other rules.)
It seems more likely to me that he was expressing himself poorly, as he’s shown a tendency to do. (Unfortunately, that tendency seems to extend to executive orders.)
I’m saying Trump is constantly saying things that he walks back on, as he did with that statement. Did you not see what I posted from the Washington Post in post #22? If you go back and read the original claim from Monty, it was clear that he meant Trump explicitly said it would apply to US servicemen. He did not. That is all.