Stupid question but let’s put it out there.
Why not put mosques in the skyscrapers then Muslims couldn’t wreck into it or bomb it.
I am assumming they wouldn’t wreck a mosque or would they?
And yes I know it wouldn’t stop non Muslim terrorists. But then again would it make Muslims mad if there mosque in a skyscraper was bombed or flown into?
Oh, brother.
I don’t know why I’m responding to this, but…
Would a mosque in the WTC have been a mosque? Would people worship there?
Also, supposedly a terrorist rationalizes the death of innocents by thinking of them as being “sped to their reward.”
The question is pretty offensive, on the face of it.
I believe that the Petronis Towers in Malaysia have worship facilities in them for Muslims, but we need to ask Muslim Guy if it is a mosque.
There were a lot of Muslims in the WTC when they were bombed.
I heard on NPR that the Taliban has already blown up lots of mosques in the pursuit of their internal enemies.
And the offensive part is?
Would a muslim blow up a mosque?
Would they think twice about doing it?
If you’re proposing that we force people to place their houses of worship in places of the State’s choosing, please do so in GD.
This thread is closed.