[QUOTE=Harriet the Spry]
Some of this is sounding like an anti-Christian bias to me. Devout Muslim and Jewish people will make their religion obvious in their dress and grooming.
[/QUOTE]
Well sure, because most Dopers don’t live in places where there’s anyone but Christians, agnostics and atheists, I expect. I do, and I was very conscious and accurate in my response: “Against, unless it’s my religion, natch. And even then, it better be subtle unless you’re a religious shop.”
And **Diogenes **is right as well. There’s a fundamental difference between a bit of statuary, be it a cross, a Buddha, an angel, a Moon Goddess or a Vishnu, and words in a language that I can read which tell me what to think. I can easily dismiss the former as decorative or cultural in intent. It’s a lot harder to dismiss words.
[QUOTE=Diogenes the Cynic]
I also think that in the last couple of decades, the evangelical Christian movement in the US has become so overtly political, hostile, mean-spirited, judgemental, tribalistic, anti-intellectual and dishonest that they’ve made all Christian branding and expression into an automatic turn-off for a lot of people even when the intentions are benign.
[/QUOTE]
ditto. Their bed, they made it. “Anti-Christian bias” is merely the rest of us saying, “Nuh-uh, you’ve gone too far. If you’re quiet and respectful and don’t bother the rest of us, like the Buddhists and Hindus in this country, we don’t mind the occasional bit of statuary. But your zealots and asshats are getting mighty close to wearing out your welcome.”
Uh…why would anyone be offended at the religious display in a religious shop? Anyone who’s offended by such, please raise your hand and go stand in the dummy corner.