I’ve often heard it said that humans have a certain amount of gold in them. That’s not surprising, because there are probably trace amounts of gold in lots of places. But do humans need gold, biologically, to survive?
Darn, I should’ve asked this around Valentine’s Day.
Is there a list somewhere of what trace elements are necessary to human health? Other than the big four (carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and hydrogen), the ones I know of are sulfur (two amino acids), chlorine (salinity level of blood, stomach acid, etc.), phosphorus (ADP and ATP), iron (hemoglobin), iodine (thyroxine), and cobalt (cyanocobalamine). Anything else?
[QUOTE=Struan]
It’s extremely unreactive so it’s not going to be involved in body chemistry.
[/QUOTE]
This does not necessarily follow. Although elemental gold in macroscopic amounts is non-reactive, gold compounds as well as gold nanoparticles can be more reactive. Dissolved gold is in fact toxic to microorganisms.
This said, there aren’t any human enzymes or other biological compounds that contain or require gold.
See here for an article on the apparent ability of some bacteria to precipitate gold.
[QUOTE=Colibri]
This does not necessarily follow. Although elemental gold in macroscopic amounts is non-reactive, gold compounds as well as gold nanoparticles can be more reactive.
[/quote]
Some are used in human medicines if wikipedia is correct.
That’ll be the aqua regia it’s dissolved in though, surely?
Up until about a decade ago, gold was a leading treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. It’s since been replaced by treatments with fewer or milder side effects, such as COX-2 inhibitors and methotrexate.
Exactly how gold works against arthritis is still unknown, but it was fairly effective, if very slow-acting.