Great, so are most people in those fora. But while everyone else is throwing down about immigration or racism or politics, you’re throwing down about your test scores and poker abilities. Do you not see the narcicism in that?
Watch this guys!
SlackerInc has an average sized penis.
CMC
@discobot fortune
Can I get a ruling on that? If it’s actually less than averaged size, please respond with “outlook not so good.”
Outlook not so good
Well, damn, that’s definitive, folks.
Hi! To find out what I can do, say @discobot display help.
Well I just snorted my beer!
You’re so full of shit. There may be some posters on this board that don’t talk about their own lives, ever. But it’s not a majority. This is routine shit “everybody” does (most people do) that you only call out when it’s someone you want to discredit for completely unrelated reasons.
I don’t deny being a little narcissistic, but let’s also be real here. Andy has tried to claim that I constantly bring up my test scores, when it has been like .00001% of the time (not intended to be a precise estimate). Then there’s poker. I earned all that Sharkscope cred over a decade ago. In that time, I have posted thousands upon thousands of posts on a variety of subjects and I’m pretty sure this is the first time I linked to it, even though it is trivially easy as I pointed out.
And the vast majority of my posts in those fora contain no personal information of any kind. Go look for yourself!
I talk about my life sometimes. Lots of posters do. But who tries to prove details about their life, besides you? Can you name and cite a single other poster who tries to prove something about their personal life to a skeptical stranger on this board?
Can you cite a single other poster who has had people express skepticism about the aspects of their personal life they have mentioned? 
As I pointed before, if one takes him as sincere, then one has to notice how painful it is when many times he has to reinvent the democratic party wheel; a very peculiar form of ignorance from one that claims to know the Democratic party ropes.
Same painful thing goes for other issues like climate change, he completely ignores that many of his sources are not too bright on that and other issues, his basic mistake is to still think that on the GOP side “there are still well-educated and intellectually curious people who support Enlightenment values and vigorously support free speech”. The problem with current issues is that those guys might support free speech alright, but they know better and still go for uneducated, non-intellectual and anti-enlightenment values.
I guess that for the Slacker, looking at getting it right 1 out of 4 is progress.
So, there is no need to concentrate with his gambling issue.
LOL, “gambling issue”. You sound like my mother-in-law, who cannot comprehend that someone can actually come out ahead by playing poker, a game of skill, against less-skilled opponents, even after the house takes its cut (the “rake”).
It would then be getting only two things right out of five then…
then, there is a reason why many are seeing you as a pretendocrat.
If anyone would like to see my penis links to PornHub are available.
CMC
I don’t care nearly enough about this to make any effort. Your personal beliefs just aren’t important to me. I tried to help - you have the tools to avoid looking ridiculous if you want. It’s up to you.
Objection! Assumes facts not in evidence. 
Your post shows zero support of this. Since it was entirely and clearly a metaphor, reaching for your online poker stats is, in fact, a clear signal that you were not, in fact, aware at the time.
This is just ass-covering as soon as you realised “Oh, shit, my NormalBoy™ mask is slipping”, ya weirdo loser.
POP QUIZ, class!:
- sense of self-importance
- preoccupation with success, brilliance
- belief they can only be understood/recognized by other special or high-status people or institutions
- unhealthy seeking of approval/recognition
- argumentative and focused on winning/dominating/proving a point or position
- need for admiration or recognition
- exhibition of inappropriate need to prove standing or accomplishments
- envy of others or a belief that others are envious of them
- demonstration of arrogant behaviors or attitudes
Who am I thinking of?
Tom Brady?
Actually, your sharing is useful to get to know you better.
Your tab on last tournaments played shows that you played a bunch of tournaments, and lost all of them, with multiple buy-ins on your part. It also shows that you play only at low stakes tables.
What I learned from online poker is that low stakes tourneys have little to do with skill. There is no bluffing, as any bet will be called.
I played back when it was legal, and while it was a little fun for a while, was a completely different animal than live poker.
So, I’d say that the statement stands, you’re “cite” does not show that you know how to bluff, and your posts show that you do not.