Do you assign personalities to numbers?

This thread was prompted by the current survey on xkcd, one question of which is which number (out of 1 to 5) is your favourite.

From a very early age when I first learned numbers, I somehow developed very strong ideas about the personalities of the digits. I still can’t help but think of them this way:

0 - a ghost. Real but slips away if you try to interact.
1 - stupid but workmanlike
2 - like your little brother, sort of playful
3 - not entirely trustworthy. Related to 9
4 - motherly, friendly, protective, nice to everyone
5 - paternal, a bit tough but practical and gets the job done
6 - your older brother, when he’s in a good mood and plays with you
7 - a bit strange, that weird girl who lives down the street and dresses funny and never joins in
8 - a stern but friendly authority figure.
9 - a dark witchy character. Quite powerful and not always nice.

Anyone else?

Why would I assign them when they have their own already?

0- The unseen Force of the universe
1- The loneliest number that you’d ever do
2- Can be as bad as one
3- The Holy Trinity
4- The Four Horseman (Ric Flair, Tully Blanchard, Arn Anderson, and Barry Windham- not Ole)
5- Odd
6- Number Six, from The Prisoner
7- Micky Mantle
8- The reason that 7 ate 9
9- Heaven

My initial reaction was “no, that’s dumb,” but I thought about it a bit. I think I perceive 7 as kind of brusque. Maybe it’s because of the very decisive strokes involved in writing it.

I’ve never thought about numbers having a personality, I can’t quite wrap my head around that. OTOH, when I’m doing math I usually root for the number 6 to appear more often in the answer than number 8. For instance, a result of 548,688 makes me a little sad while 546,866 makes me a little happier. No idea why.

No. No I don’t.

Same here. I’m a little fascinated at the relationship people have with numbers, though. I mean, I do have a go-to number when choosing a uniform or something, that being 12. But it’s just a number like all the others.

Not personalities but colors.

0 is white
2 is red
3 is green
4 is blue
5 is yellow
6 is red
7 is blue

For me it’s gender:

1 - male
2 - female
3 - female
4 - female
5 - male
6 - female
7 - male
8 - male
9 - female
10 - male

Sure do!

Oddly enough, they are all connected to the Multiplication Rock cartoons. Love that Lucky Seven.

Only to pi, because you can’t have a conversation with it. It just goes on and on and on…

See ideasthesia.

I don’t assign personalities to numbers, but I do associate other odd qualities such as colors/brightness/moods with them.

1 - simple, bland
2 - cold, hard
3 - warm, thin
4 - sharp, pressing
5 - worrisome
6 - relieved, but cold
7 - warm, bright, sunny
8 - hot, big, enough for everyone
9 - uncomfortably bloated

Daniel Tammet, a savant, describes qualities for every integer up to 10,000. He appears not to be making them up, as he is consistent in his reporting for each number.

There are only two numbers, 0 and 1. I like 1 a lot better than 0.

After thinking about it, I guess I kind of do.

1 - nice guy; kind of rakish
2 - priggish young lady
3- kind of a tomboy
4 - practical (and for some reason, blonde)
5 - sort of a frat boy type
6 - cocquettish
7 - big man on campus sort, but not quite as wild as 5
8- wise, fat old uncle
9 - matronly, sensible
10- Bossy but dependable

Relevant.

No personalities, but I do have to say that some numbers just seem preferable to me somehow. Often they include 7 and 3 and are often prime.
3, 7, 13, 17, 21, 27, 37.

My locker number in high school was 113 and I thought that was just the best.

only 69. Friendly

I did when I was little. I liked the even numbers better, and thought nine was just mean. I think it’s because I was learning about addition, and had found out that adding nine to a number made the ones digit decrease by one. So 15 + 9 was 24, and the ones digit in the answer was now a 4.

Well, it made sense at the time.

There are 10 kinds of people?

No, that is so dumb.

4 and 7 are male and 8 is jolly, not stern. 3 and 6 are female. Other than that though, you got most of them right.