I’m not so sure about your ideas, but as a confirmed omnivore I agree I don’t much give a damn.
As a linguistic purist I give a lot more of a damn about marketers debasing the language in pursuit of sales.
I actually like names like “tofurkey”. It makes it clear that A) it’s veg-based, and B) it isn’t turkey but it’s intended to be an analog to turkey. Strictly speaking, “vegan turkey” or “soy turkey” or “TVP turkey” are all non sequiturs. As is a hell of a lot of other marketing speak, e.g. “cable modem”. But that doesn’t mean we ought to encourage it; if I was King, marketers muddling the language would be a hanging offense. After a *very *short trial.
Ref Bo’s comment about vegan fake-chicken, fake-turkey, fake-beef, fake-pork, and fake-shrimp tasting & having mouth-feel like their non-fake models. The clear point is that it is legit to name these things in reference to the meat product they’re designed to resemble.
My vote would be to label them as mock-whatever. Mock-turtle has a long pedigree that we should extend here.
It’s not vegan sausage. If it’s ordinary TVP it’s mock-sausage, or if the product is hard core and trying to emphasize formal vegan-ness versus mere vegetarian-ness then it’s “vegan mock-whatever”. Or “vegan organic mock-whatever”. Or the great grand-daddy of dietary orthodoxy, “paleo vegan organic mock-whatever”. Not snarky; serious. Vegan, paleo, and organic are restrictive adjectives. They don’t define what it is, they define what it isn’t.
So now we need the rest of the name to say what it is; and that is abolutely *not *turkey or chicken or whatever. But, ref **Bo **again, it *is *valuable to define it in terms of what it’s aimed at duplicating. Mock-whatever does it for me. And ref me above I’d hang any marketer that left the “mock-” off the name.
This is a lot of it. Many people are dragged into vegetarianism/veganism for various external reasons and they want familiar sounding names for the analogs to their familiar products. They want to be able to make their well-known recipes with simple drop-in ingredient changes.
The marketers want the smallest possible obstacle between doubtful try-ers and new adopters.