A Canadian documentary filmmaker, who only has one working eye, is building a camera into a prosthetic eyeball so that he can take video from his other eye socket:
No word about the audio.
A Canadian documentary filmmaker, who only has one working eye, is building a camera into a prosthetic eyeball so that he can take video from his other eye socket:
No word about the audio.
Foretold in The Continuous Katherine Mortenhoe by D.G. Compton in 1974!
I’m amazed that no one has done this yet.
I think it will suck as a documentary though. The quality probably won’t be all that great and he’ll be blinking over the camera every few seconds. Sound quality will suck because he’s trying to keep the equipment secret.
Small wireless microphones can be easily hidden under clothes. Which I just did this morning, and there were no complaints on sound quality from the DP.
Aside from the blinking issue, I imagine the video quality would be at least as good, if not better, than the standard purse-cam that news reporters use for their expose news stories. It won’t be sleek and shiny like high-quality film in a steadicam, but it won’t be worse than other documentary footage we’ve seen.
This is so very very cool.
Not to mention the David compton novel (and Harvel Keitel) movie Death Watch
You think that’s crazy, check this out.
Remote control, camera loaded insects. Gives “bugging” a room a whole new meaning.
As far as I know, Death Watch was a filming of the Compton novel The Continuous Katherine Mortenhoe. As so often happens, I presume the novel got renamed after the movie came out.
Is there a blink reflex for a fake eyeball?
All the people I’ve ever met who had glass eyes blinked them. It would be very, very freaky if they only blinked the one, don’t you think ?
Isn’t it obvious where a microphone-shaped device should be placed?