It has infiltrated both parties, but not in the same ways and not to the same ends. The distinctions are important.
Here’s a link to a list from Open Secrets that tracks disclosed donations: Overview of Top Individual Donations
Jeff Bezos (Amazon) purchased the Washington Post, but that doesn’t mean he required his reporters to spew lies in order to advance a liberal agenda. WaPo remains one of the most reliably accurate news organizations for providing factual, provable information to the public. That’s not how the Mercers did it when they funded Breitbart, or Rupert Murdoch when he funded Fox “News.”
Fundamentally, that’s the difference I see in big money donated to each side. In general, liberals will donate to institutions and candidates whom they believe will advance basic ideals of liberalism. No specific strings are attached. So-called neo-conservatives – and they are not the traditional conservatives I remember from years past – donate money to institutions and candidates from whom they require specific political responses. “We will give you money with the requirements that you give us the tax cuts we have dictated to you, repeal and replace (haha!) of the health care bill, appoint these judges, remove these specific regulations.”
Big difference.
I have no problem limiting contributions to political parties on both sides and doing away with PACs and super PACs entirely. Rulings in Citizens United, SpeechNow.org and McCutcheon need to go away. We currently have a nightmare of campaign finance that favors those who are willing to turn a blind eye to decency, honesty and any genuine desire to advance basic wellbeing for the most citizens in our country.