No because as far as overall goals are concerned there really is a good side and a bad side in this fight (hint: the bad side is the one that wants to eradicate their enemy). The Palestinians didn’t lose a game of chess. They were on the wrong side of a huge war with real consequences for that choice. Instead of realizing the error of their ways they have spent the decades since making things worse for themselves.
If I gamble my house in a card game and lose, am I justified in trying to kill the winner to get it back?
If a Native American tribe in say, Oklahoma, decided that they wanted their land back and started waging war against the state, would you be fine with that? What if they decided that one of their goals in addition to reclaiming land was to kill as many non-NA people as possible?
Why are you so content to have the Palestinians take up arms rather than use other means to fight for their “legitimate grievance.”
Which part of
“And yes, “Jewish people in a state of displacement” accepted it for thousands of years. Jewish people were displaced from a myriad of places. And accepted it. In 1948 “Jewish people” accepted a tiny bit of land which ALL belonged to them in the past that they were displaced from.”
was not clear to you? Being displaced and accepting it, again and again, is part of Jewish history. So is surviving the dispersal and coming back.
As I said, if Israel was somehow defeated and by some miracle the Jews somehow survived, I would be urging them and working on having them get out from under the genocidal Arab occupying regime instead of staying in place.
Er…you just did. My turn to say I misinterpreted what I read. I didn’t know your previous stance on Hamas and thought you kinda were asking to disprove the “fake charter”. Rereading in light of your current statement and not actually skipping over the “and while I don’t doubt it,” phrase that was clearly in your earlier post makes my comment seem kinda stupid.
