Right? Or how about Benghazi, the investigations of which lasted Obama’s entire second term? How many people were arrested or indicted as a result of either of these investigations, again? Anyone arguing that the Mueller investigation has gone on too long lacks any historical context and hasn’t been paying any attention whatsoever.
Or they are hypocrites.
Afraid of the outcome.
Trump sure Tweets like he is.
You seem to be under the mistaken impression that Mueller’s mandate was to investigate Trump. That’s not so. The scope of the mandate is to investigate links between the Russian government and the Trump campaign team (and any crimes discovered in the process). Considering that 1) we know for a fact that the Russian government launched a campaign of cyber attacks and propaganda against the US, and 2) several Trump campaign officials admitted to meeting with representatives of the Russian government, there’s no reality that exists where the investigation is a witch hunt. Whether or not Trump is ultimately implicated in any collusion, the investigation has yielded more than 3 dozen indictments for crimes against the US. If that’s “nothing” after 2 years, then you may want to rethink where your loyalty lies.
The Russians gave the Clinton foundation $500,000.00 for a speech.
The NY times says Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal.
Now, can you show me a source that says the Russians gave more To Trump? Where are they?
And while y our at it, Iran and Saudi Arabia gave Clinton over 20 million combined.
Where is the proof the Russians stole it and gave it to Trump? Show me please? With a team of investigators and millions spent, there is no proof.
I can say the Russians also gave Clinton information. Doesn’t make it true.
China and Russia try to hack the USA all the time. If they did get information it was on Obama’s watch, and Clinton’s illegal private server sending classified information.
YOU said the Russians gave more to Clinton than they have given to Trump, so how much did they give to Trump, and what is your source? Using your asinine “logic”, I could make the claim that Guam is larger than Australia just by stating that the area of Guam is 210 square miles. 210 whole square miles! Unless you can prove that Guam isn’t 210 square miles in area, then it must be larger than Australia!
BTW, the last time I checked Iran and Saudi Arabia aren’t a part of Russia.
Russian mobsters funneled millions in dirty money through Trump properties.
How many of these allegations are for collusion? Zero. How many indictments are there on Trump? That would be zero again. I’ll stand on these points and wager nothing happens to Trump.
They are going after a guy on not paying his taxes over a decade ago. What does that have to do with the main point of the investigation?!
If the Russian attack is to fully explored, why not examine Obama who told his cyber chief to stand down or Clinton’s private server? Drill down, and spread a wide net, I guaranteed you they find other crimes. To only examine once side is questionable when the USA Election is the topic. That is where my loyalty stands
As for indictments, how many does the Clinton’s have by now? Over 30? I think so.
I’m asking for political donations in the 2018 election. If true, what you posted happened in the 1990’s.
And I am asking you to back up your statement that the Russians gave more to Clinton than they have given to Trump.
Money to the Clinton foundation is not a political donation. Just because Trump used his foundation as a personal piggy bank does not mean other foundations do.
The Clinton Foundation is highly rated by charity watch.
https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=16680
What, you think that he’s not beholden to any Russians for (temporarily) saving at least one of his businesses?
Can you show me in the US Code or any other federal law where the crime of “collusion” is? I’d like to read up on it.
3 of the convictions (Papadapolous, Flynn, and Gates) are for lying to investigators about the exact sort of links between the Russian government and the Trump campaign that the special counsel was appointed to investigate.
Can you show me in the special investigation appointment letter where they’re only allowed to investigate Trump himself? It’s short but I can’t find it in there.
It’s cute that you describe it as tax evasion instead of money laundering, which is the actual crime. And it’s money that came from Russian politicians in Ukraine. Considering the scope of the investigation is links between the Russian government and the Trump campaign, payments made in the past between Russian politicians and Trump’s campaign manager seem to be entirely “the main point” of the investigation.
Whatabout you go address these questions in their own threads that you ran away from after people refuted your nonsense?
Whatabout, whatabout, whatabout you actually argue in good faith on the topic at hand?
I could, but one of them is not relevant to the OP. My question had to do with whether or not Mueller believes the a sitting president–any sitting president, not just your idol–can be indicted and, if not, does the issue of Russian collusion boil down to a PR fight. You apparently chose to ignore that and started off on yet another Trump-is-always-right-and-he-will-win-win-win rant. But whatever.
How many indictments do the clinton’s have? do tell.
How many of them have led to convictions and/or guilty pleas?
(IOW - CITE?)
Both Clintons combined received exactly zero dollars in political donations in the 2018 election.
**Silver_lining **provides the answer to the OP. He won’t accept the results of the probe regardless of what those results show. There is no evidence that he will accept, so there is no PR to be had that will help as he has declared himself impervious to facts.
Technically, he has included a criteria that we already know to be false, as his condition for acceptance.
“I will only accept that Bob murdered Jane if Bob is covered in her blood and Jane was actually a person from outer space.” Somewhat reasonable up to the point where you get to the “and”. Not only is the latter unlikely to be true, but it’s also completely irrelevant to the question of murder.
We currently don’t believe that the Russians modified any voter equipment, but no one ever accused them of doing so, nor was that ever a condition of collusion. Effectiveness is not a condition of collusion, either. If the Russians did nothing of any value for the election, but Trump paid them to, swapped information with them, or did anything else, then it’s treasonous. Maybe not Constitutionally treasonous, but certainly by lay-speak. So to add any extra requirements is, simply, a disservice to the nation and grossly shameful mental dishonesty for the purpose of partisan politics.