They can damn well bring back reciepts, then. Assholes.
Also, I’ll keep my eye out for any of my own representatives making August, local appearances.
Moderating:
… and none of this is relevant to this thread. Let’s either drop it or take it to another thread now, please.
My apologies for my part in the hijack.
It’s ok. It happens. Meant as only a gentle reminder.
I scared the dog.
He’s also said only criminals plead the 5th so there’s that.
He’s said a lot of things that aren’t, y’know, true.
Slate article analyses that recent Supreme Court case on the 1st Amendment limits on threat and intimidation charges.
Concludes that the decision will provide support for federal charges against Trump re January 6.
The grand jury has left the building, the foreperson has not left. This is getting reporters a bit excited. They are saying that the foreperson would be needed to sign off on an indictment.
They are nearly aquiver.
Jack smith has left the building. The foreperson has not. The fore person is in the magistrate’s office.
Reporters are in full aquiver.
We could hear at any moment now.
Or it may be tomorrow. 
Thanks for the tips. I’ve just tuned into CNN, and the reporters and panelists are in place; seemingly on the edges of their seats. Filling a lot of air time by repeating what is known, and speculating on what might happen.
Indictment handed up for an “unnamed individual” per MSNBC.
donald thinks it’s coming today (although tomorrow is seeming to be more likely)
ETA: @Aspenglow Really??!
Just as I finished posting! Ninja’d by CNN?
LOL, yes, really!!!
Single malt.
Indictment has happened, no names on it.
The frenzy is about to go full out.
Forgive my ignorance of US legal practice - what does this (“no names on it”) mean?
j
I like that idea!
That it hasn’t gone public as yet. Waiting on it being posted.