Uh, what? A bit of a citation here?
Nonsense. I’m perfectly content in requiring an answer from Starving Artist. What I am uncertain of is why you suddenly show up accusing me of being obsessed or unrelaxed. Have you read Starving Artist posts in this thread?
And I, for one, am not going to spend the next two hours blaming a sleep medication for my inability to answer my opponents logically and with thought. Instead, I shall simply go to bed.
You’re new here, aren’t you?
Liar.
You misspelled “bemusement and irritation”.
If true, is that a comment on Obama or on the population?
It’s called “having a laugh on the pollsters”
[/quote]
Or much.
There were no legitimate questions. Obama gave up his birth certificate a long time ago. This latest certificate proves what he said was true, that he gave his birth info accurately 3 years ago.
In case you can not digest the truth, he gave his birth information accurately and completely. So claiming he did not or that he was covering up is wrong. The conclusion is they trumped up a story that appealed to some nut cases and bigots. But Obama’s information that he gave 3 years ago was accurate and valid. You birthers were wrong and you should have accepted the proof he offered. It is after all legal proof of birth.
Hillary never asked any questions about it or made it the slightest issue.
I believe all I’ve ever done is apologize in advance for any typos or odd grammar caused by said sleeping medication, and even then only a couple of times and so far as I can recall in good humor. To wit:
Once again you reveal the dishonesty, both intellectual and factual, that has come to define you on this board.
I believe her camp did, and it was that which prompted the original release of the standard, legal document.
Hey SA,
How you doin’? Care to admit you were wrong yet? Or are you still a sickening liar unable to scrape up even trivial levels of integrity?
You’re just rancid, cowardly filth, you know?
You believe incorrectly. The issue was never raised by Hillary’s campaign.
So when you said “Hillary Clinton’s campaign” you really meant “people who have no actual affiliation to Hillary Clinton or her campaign”?
Here’s an article that outlines the issue’s history starting when Obama was in Chicago and states that it was an anonymous email from Hillary’s supporters that triggered the issue nationally.
Surely you see the difference between Hillary’s campaign and Hillary’s supporters. I’ve seen no evidence that her campaign was behind the rumors.
As it turns out they seem to have no “official” affiliation to her campaign (though we all know that neither she nor her husband are above any dirty trick they can think of).
At any rate, I seemed to recall the question originating from her camp and didn’t parse it down to campaign vs. supporters. Does it really matter that much? The point is that this “retarded” issue first rose to national prominance during Obama’s challenge to Hillary and was not created by a right-wing “birther” conspiracy.
You are correct, as I’ve just noted in my post to Algorithm.
In other words, nothing to do with Hillary’s campaign. She’s not responsible for what “anonymous supporters” say on the internet, nor do we even know that they were really her supporters. I can write anonymous letters claiming to be a Palin supporter accusing Donald Trump of being a dog fucker. Does that mean the “Palin camp” would be accusing Trump of being a dog fucker?
Hillary never gave this birther crap the slightest credence. Obama started his stopthesmears site after the birther claims starting cropping up on right wing sites like New Republic.
Hell, they even had their friend Vince Foster murdered!
:rolleyes:
CMC fnord!
I’m happy to concede that Hillary and/or her campaign played no evident role in making an issue of Obama’s birth, though I reiterate that the issue appears have first come to national prominence as a result of left-wing political engineering.
Don’t roll your eyes at me; I never said that.