This has been explained to you several times, but you just aren’t getting it. Cecil Newton did not turn down money. Mississippi State didn’t offer any. Rogers asked for cash, and MSU turned them down. Got it? Now, is it still hard to understand why someone would turn down an offer of $0 to play for $0?
They gave Cam Newton the same trophy that Reggie Bush had to return earlier this year. They just scratched off Bush’s name and wrote Newton’s underneath it. Extending a proud tradition…
No similarity between the cases. Reggie Bush got extra benefits, nobody associated with Cam Newton got extra benefits.
A USC assistant coach handled the details of delivering the extras. No one at Auburn delivered anything.
Reggie Bush was well aware of the extra goodies. Cam Newton knew nothing about his father discussing money with Kenny Rogers.
I see that Cam Newton’s name was entered on 93% of the ballots. That’s a very good indication that the voters took time to look at and evaluate the details involved here.
Question: A few years back, did you just assume the Duke Lacrosse players raped that stripper?
I think you are bitter, and are prone to rush to judgment.
Duke lacrosse players didn’t have a documented history of raping strippers. Auburn University has a documented history of paying players, admitted by a former coach.
So, it’s still guilty until proven innocent.
“Guilty until proven innocent” is what many people with a grudge against the SEC think when an SEC team is under controversy.
Lamar:
I see you conveniently left a date off of your quote. That can’t be because it was at least nine years old, can it? Calling something written by Paul Davis, an acknowledged Auburn hater “a documented fact” is very careless.
I mean, if Bowden put a stop to it and Bowden was hired in '93, that means the last payment must have been about 18 years ago, if Bowden isn’t lying.
Since the article calls Bowden a sports commentator with a home in Orlando, that would be after Bowden quit coaching at Auburn after being notified that he was going to be fired. That makes this quote of Bowden’s around 12 years old.
Why didn’t Bowden speak up in 1993? Another bitter person with no proof is the best guess.
No, it’s not. It is on tape and Bowden acknowledged it and said it was fine to publicize it.
I liked it better when SEC fans just said “if you ain’t cheating, you ain’t trying” and “it ain’t cheating if you don’t get caught”.
This faux-innocent “what, us cheat? Impossible!” head-in-the-sand schtick is a lot less endearing.
You have a point, but if someone is going to point the finger and yell “CHEATER”, they need to have something more than “it just doesn’t feel quite right”.
Such things wouldn’t fly on the SDMB, and certainly don’t fly in an investigation or court case.
That’s one of the most weasel posts I’ve ever read. “I know we don’t have any evidence, but I would prefer it if you didn’t defend yourself”
Weasel post.