Why? Some of us like 'em, as should be clear from the comments.
I was once nearly smothered by a large pair of boobs, it’s not an experience I want to repeat. I don’t like excessively large boobs.
That’s the way I want to go.
What I want to know is why does internet porn seem to tend toward extremes? I look at porn it seems to be filled with girls who are too thin and bony so I try searching for something a bit fuller figured. I end up faced with morbidly obese whale women. If I try for “normal” I end up with generally unattractive. Want just little bit of juiciness? Nope, have to make do with a gushing river instead.
As far as big breasted bouncy babes go, I don’t mind a busty girl but the ones in the link are beyond bountiful.
This is probably why I’m so fearful of my boobs getting larger and saggy. I can just imagine one day they’d be huge and long enough to strangle me. :eek:
Nope, I can’t, because size was never important to me. Shape and firmness, yes; size, nope.
Don’t you go thinking that way. I’ve been a guy for quite a long time. Practically all women my age have at least some sag, and most likely quite a bit. It doesn’t bother guys at all, and a lot of us quite like it. And as far as size goes, most of the posts I’m seeing in this thread don’t sound much like the men I’ve known, or me, for that matter. Most of us like them big. It’s not a big deal if they’re not (my wife’s are Bs), but big (natural) ones are wonderful. They look good, they feel good, they are good.
Of course, you’re probably also self-conscious because men are always looking at them, if not downright ogling. If I were around you, I’d definitely be looking at them (whilte trying to be subtle about it, of course). We don’t look because we don’t like them. But I’d imagine that, really, you’d rather we didn’t like them quite as much as we do. Sorry. We’re wired that way.
I have found this to be the truth for every guy I’ve ever dated, too. Mine aren’t particularly large or small or pert or round. They’re just…uh, boobs. No guy has ever, EVER been turned off by seeing them in person or not enjoyed fiddling with them.
My current boyfriend is 100% a “boob guy.” He likes 'em in all shapes and sizes. Mine could be 2 sizes bigger or 2 sizes smaller and he wouldn’t care - as long as they’re available to him.
Erm, these days that could be anything up to a DD
http://www.thedenverdailynews.com/?page=details&id=6822&t=Archive
Well, I wonder if things like in the link aren’t as much fascination as anything else. Don’t humans like to look at train wrecks? At accidents? And I know there are plenty of websites out there who cater to oddities of human bodies, etc. I’m not saying there aren’t some men aroused by that (if you imagine it, someone gets off to it) but I’ll bet you a bunch are just fascinated, too.
As for breasts in general, my favorite type of guy is the guy who likes his girlfriend’s/wife’s breasts. Whatever size they may be. Sure, you can have a preference, but I may have a preference in certain things in guys and yet not necessarily have them in my guy! And I don’t think - or at least I hope - that the type of breasts you want is the only decider in a prospective mmate.
I think you’re overreacting. Yes, I like perky tiny ones. Would it make me less shallow and ageist if I said I would love to find a compatible woman around my age who had a doctorate in philosophy and closely aligned political views and real curiousity about life AND has cute perky A-cups? And if you know someone like this, can you give me her number?
Look, I would love to be happy with larger, saggier breasts. But the thing is, I can’t change what I can’t change. I accepted long ago that I like what I like. And it’s not like I have some sort of grudge against those that don’t fit my ideal. So I’m going with Autolycus on this. I’m not going to apologize for being exactly who I am.
Conversations like this one are sort of the reason I own an amazingly large collection of hoodies that also fit my husband (who’s 9 inches taller and a good 100 pounds heavier than me). Well, in conjunction with the staring if I wear anything with a neckline anything more daring than “Convent Chic”. Necklines in my world are either “a decolletage my grandmother would find modest” or “Hi! I’m a pr0n star! See my boobies?!?!” without anything like a middle ground.
They’re also the reason I feel miserably sorry at times for my best friend - because she’s a little tiny woman with breasts the size of moderate watermelons. Her breasts are cup size HH and I (different sized exceptionally large natural breasts - that’s like extra bonus craptactularness), but she’s only 5’3 and not a lady of otherwise robust stature. An amazing number of people feel entitlted, nay compelled, to debate the origin of her breasts with her. Total strangers will come up to her, apropos of nothing at all, and start to lecture her on the evils of implants. She’s a polite woman, so she doesn’t throttle these assholes. She’s endured a vast number of comments from bosses, HR directors, her pastor, her relatives, and administrators at her school expressing their concern that her attire isn’t sufficiently modest - when she’s wearing a sweater that covers her from the hollow of her throat to mid-thigh and bags everywhere except across the chest.
I know that the OP and most of the people responding don’t actually mean to make me (or anyone) uncomfortable, but there’s a whole lot of comment in this thread that just makes me feel revolting based on a physical feature I have no control over outside of reasonably expensive surgical options.
If you have an ass you don’t care for the shape of, you can generally modify it with exercise and diet - at least to some extent. If it’s the shape of your arms and legs you don’t like (provided the problem isn’t length :P) you can generally work on it. Tummy not taut enough for ya? There’s ab crunches for that! Hair, eye, skin color not to your liking - at least temporarily fixable. Aside from surgery (surgery that my doctors are reluctant to perform on a woman who has yet to complete her intended childbearing - God knows I’ve asked more than once about it), there’s not a single thing I can really do about my breasts. They do not gain or loose weight in conjunction with the rest of me - I know this because I’ve gained and lost up to 60 pounds without my bras getting noticably looser or tighter. I can tone the pecs to alleviate some sagging - which I do, although for reasons other than that - but even wearing a bra 24/7/365 (which I’ve essentially done for two decades now) doesn’t stop gravity. And, to be totally brutally honest, they were a little saggy when I was twelve and they first appeared - and we’re not going to discuss the collateral damage of a twelve year old sprouting D cup breasts in less than three months.
I dont think the posters were saying that they ONLY liked breasts of that sort they were merely pointing out,no pun intended,the optimum of their choice.
Id like a brand new Rolls Royce,but if I was lucky enough to own one a few years old Id still be pretty pleased.
We’re just talking about base, physical attraction, not absolute evaluation of a potential mate. Of course sexual attraction is ageist. It’s supposed to be. Studies on cross-cultural standards of “beauty,” show that sexual attraction universally tends towards characteristics which suggest youth, fertility and health. That doesn’t mean that many other standards don’t come into play, both culturally and individually, but the animal parts of our brain want mates who look like they can help us reproduce or bear children. Just because people are hardwired to be sexually attracted to people who look vibrant, youthful and healthful doesn’t mean that the thinking parts of our brain are slaves to the animal parts or that we can’t be attracted to people who don’t fit a certain physical ideal. If men only pursued women we thought were physical perfect tens, we’d all be virgins.
What does breast size or firmness have to do with health or fertility, though? Especially in a time before bras were invented I’d think the average fertile woman would have at least some sag going on.
I guess perkiness and lift would suggest something about youth. I don’t think size would have anything to do with it.
Possibly. Although large size might serve to emphasize gender differences, which Desmond Morris (never a good source for facts) says are very sexy. My own theory? “Dayum!”
I should point out that at 50, my ex was still defying gravity somewhat.
I don’t understand the appeal of itty bitties, and I’m a woman who is rather small in the cups.
I can see how small breasts are cute and adorable. But hawt? Sexier than bigger breasts of comparable shape? Now granted, I’m a straight woman, but I find it difficult to “empathize” with that preference. Perhaps because small breasts don’t seem to be that much of a departure from what guys have, so I’m unable to understand why they would be special enough to merit praises.
But I don’t disbelieve guys when they say they’re turned on by a small rack, because I’ve witnessed this first hand, much to my relief.
Maybe I should start a thread asking guys to explain the allure of small breasts.
I’m also not turned on. In fact, I refuse to go to the link after reading aobut what’s there. I could be impotent for a week.
I’ve asked myself what my attraction is. I prefer seeing the curves of the proportionate large breasts. The super large breasts are something that I look at just as I look at a deer in the headlights or a highway car crash. I actually feel tense as I imagine they pull on the back and feel taught like sunburned skin does. Small doesn’t usually attract my attention, but if she is vibrant and alive then that attracts me. Similarly, a well endowed woman with a bored attitude is glanced at and dismissed. I’ll also look at a male or female bodybuilder and admire the intricate curves and layering but can’t imagine that it would be comfortable to be in or touch.
As to why again - there is something about it being hard-wired. There are curves and straight lines that work and don’t work in architecture and it applies in body shape as well. A disproportionate shape is a glaring problem. But everyone’s sense of what is proportionate varies. I wonder if a person’s taste in architecture in terms of proportion, curves, and lines might not mirror their taste in form.