Dracula questions (Possible Spoilers)

I just finished reading Bram Stoker’s Dracula last night and some things still remain unclear to me, which hopefully someone can clear up.

  1. What is the significance of the Renfield character?
    He collects/eats flies, spiders, and in one case a bird. He also meets the Count, tells everyone about him and ends up facing his untimely demise over it. But i just don’t understand how the whole zoophagous thing tied into the story. It seems like it should.

  2. Whats up with all the boxes?
    When the Count comes to London he brings with him 50 boxes filled with Earth. Why? I believe they were filled with Earth, i think when Jonathon first goes to the Castle and finds the Count sleeping he stumbles upon several boxes filled with Earth, however through the rest of the story they are referred to as Earthen-boxes. Either way, why did the Count have to bring 50 with him and distribute them all around London?

Thanks everyone!

Dracula suffers from the vampire weakness of having to sleep in the native earth of his homeland—or unhallowed ground, in a pinch—so he pre-positioned the boxes around London for use in “safe houses.”

Renfeld was, I believe, being groomed to be a servant of the Count. The eating flies thing was at the Count’s behest, theoretically giving him some powers (becoming like a vampire.)

I doubt there was much reason for Dracula to have picked him beyond that he was close and stuck listening to him by being locked in a cell. But I’d agree that from a storytelling standpoint, he was pretty much only added for the sake of atmosphere.

It’s because both Renfield and the Count were zoophagous. Renfield eats the animals because he’s trying to absorb their life force into him. So, with his particular mania, he falls under the Count’s influence.

Renfield misunderstood his place on the food chain. He thought the pattern was flies get consumed by spiders, spiders get consumed by birds, birds get consumed by humans, and then humans become vampires. Dracula’s view was that flies get consumed by spiders, spiders get consumed by birds, birds get consumed by humans, and then humans get consumed by vampires. In fictional terms it was to show the readers that people like them would lose their place at the top and be reduced to prey animals by vampires.

As Ranchoth said, Dracula needed contact with his native soil so he kept stashs around. In book terms, it was to show the reader that Dracula remained an alien presense in England - monsters like him came from foreign places and while they might invade England they could never really become a part of England.

Were you surprised at who ‘killed’ Dracula, and by what means?

(bolding mine)

As others have already chimed in on the predator-prey thing, I can only nitpick. Earth, capital E, is the name of the third planet from Sol–that is, the orb upon which we live. The proper term for a mass of soil or dirt is earth, capitalized only at the beginning of sentences. Also, Harker’s first name is Jonathan.
:: looks around nervously for Gaudere & cringes in anticipation of her wrath ::

I didn’t think Renfield’s mania came from the Count. It just happened that his zoophagy was a way the Count got influence over him.

I thought the Count picked him because of what I mention above.

Van Helsing mentions somewhere that a vampire cannot enter a house until he is invited in by one of the residents (cite). The Count needs Renfield to ask him into the asylum.

I never figured out how a vampire could come into someone’s bedroom to feed at all conveniently. With Lucy, he bites her first in the graveyard, and then Ipresumably) she asks him in to bite her some more. I can’t recall - where does Dracula bite Mina? Is that in a house where he has been invited in?

Regards,
Shodan

This appears to be the first time Mina is bitten. Note that it occurs late in the novel, after the men in Mina’s life have banded together to destroy Dracula. It is motivated out of revenge and/or desire to have an agent in his enemies’ midst, not because of any “undying love” nonsense.

Chapter 19:

"I thought that I was asleep,and waiting for Jonathan to come back. I was very anxious about him, and I was powerless to act, my feet, and my hands, and my brain were weighted,so that nothing could proceed at the usual pace. And so I slept uneasily and thought. Then it began to dawn upon me that the air was heavy, and dank, and cold. I put back the clothes from my face, and found, to my surprise, that all was dim around. The gaslight which I had left lit for Jonathan, but turned down, came only like a tiny red spark through the fog, which had evidently grown thicker and poured into the room. Then it occurred to me that I had shut the window before I had come to bed. I would have got out to make certain on the point, but some leaden lethargy seemed to chain my limbs and even my will.I lay still and endured, that was all. I closed my eyes, but could still see through my eyelids. (It is wonderful what tricks our dreams play us, and how conveniently we can imagine.) The mist grew thicker and thicker and I could see now how it came in, for I could see it like smoke, or with the white energy of boiling water, pouring in, not through the window, but through the joinings of the door. It got thicker and thicker, till it seemed as if it became concentrated into a sort of pillar of cloud in the room,through the top of which I could see the light of the gas shining like a red eye. Things began to whirl through my brain just as the cloudy column was now whirling in the room, and through it all came the scriptural words “a pillar of cloud by day and of fire by night.” Was it indeed such spiritual guidance that was coming to me in my sleep? But the pillar was composed of both the day and the night guiding, for the fire was in the red eye, which at the thought gat a new fascination for me, till, as I looked, the fire divided, and seemed to shine on me through the fog like two red eyes,such as Lucy told me of in her momentary mental wandering when,on the cliff,the dying sunlight struck the windows of St.Mary’s Church. Suddenly the horror burst upon me that it was thus that Jonathan had seen those awful women growing into reality through the whirling mist in the moonlight, and in my dream I must have fainted, for all became black darkness.The last conscious effort which imagination made was to show me a livid white face bending over me out of the mist.

I must be careful of such dreams, for they would unseat one’s reason if there were too much of them."

We are left to suspect that Mina somehow invited Dracula herself, but we later learn who the real culprit was.

Chapter 21:

The patient went on without stopping, “Then he began to whisper.Rats, rats, rats! Hundreds, thousands, millions of them, and every one a life.And dogs to eat them, and cats too. All lives! All red blood, with years of life in it, and not merely buzzing flies!' I laughed at him, for I wanted to see what he could do. Then the dogs howled, away beyond the dark trees in His house. He beckoned me to the window. I got up and looked out,and He raised his hands,and seemed to call out without using any words. A dark mass spread over the grass, coming on like the shape of a flame of fire. And then He moved the mist to the right and left,and I could see that there were thousands of rats with their eyes blazing red, like His only smaller. He held up his hand, and they all stopped, and I thought he seemed to be saying, All these lives will I give you, ay,and many more and greater, through countless ages, if you will fall down and worship me!’ And then a red cloud, like the color of blood, seemed to close over my eyes, and before I knew what I was doing, I found myself opening the sash and saying to Him, `Come in, Lord and Master!’ The rats were all gone, but He slid into the room through the sash, though it was only open an inch wide, just as the Moon herself has often come in through the tiniest crack and has stood before me in all her size and splendor.”

Mina, Jonathan & the whole bunch are staying at Seward’s sanitarium. When Renfield invites Dracula in, D apparently has total access.

Oh, absolutely.

[spoiler]I wonder how Bram Stoker secured the rights to have Sherlock Holmes appear in his novel.

And I did not realize that flamethrowers existed in the 19th Century, let alone the jetpacks that Holmes and Watson fly in with.[/spoiler]

The two famous authors of these literary characters were contemporaries and friends in real life. Coulda happened.

Hijack, but this reminds me of one of my favorite bits of literary trivia.

Bram Stoker’s wife, Florence Balcombe, had previously been courted by (of all people) Oscar Wilde. When she became engaged to Stoker, Wilde said there was no point remaining in Dublin and vowed never to return to Ireland again. He did make a couple of visits back to Ireland, but spent the rest of his life living elsewhere.

I have heard that the Stoker marriage was not a particularly happy one. I like to imagine that at some point during an argument Mrs. Stoker said “I don’t know why I ever married you, I could have been Mrs. Oscar Wilde!” Although by 1895 I’m sure Mrs. Stoker would have had no reason to envy Mrs. Wilde.

That’s a bit of a weird one because, as I recall, Bram Stoker was also gay. Do you think Florence Balcombe just seemed to make a particularly good beard?

Maybe she was her generation’s Judy Garland.

There is a good deal of debate over whether or not Stoker was gay (I kind of think he was, especially based on the letters he exchanged with Walt Whitman). And the relationship between Stoker, Wilde, and Florence Balcombe seemed to be a complicated one–or at least a strange one, based on what I’ve read. In fact, it reminded me of many different literary triangles where the woman basically serves as a safe outlet/go-between for the two men.

There have long been rumors that Stoker was gay, but it isn’t clear. Even if true, Mrs. Stoker would have had reason to feel she was better off with him than Wilde since she was at least spared the embarrassment of having her husband publicly tried and convicted of “gross indecency”.

Anyway, Florence Balcombe was considered a very attractive woman in her day, and certainly could have attracted a heterosexual man. I remember reading some allusion to rumors that she was attracting (and more) heterosexual men while married to Stoker, but I don’t know if that’s true either.

We do have Mrs. Stoker to thank for the destruction of most prints of the 1922 Murnau film Nosferatu. Bram Stoker was dead by then but Florence was still alive, and sued the filmmakers for copyright violation. She demanded not only royalties but the destruction of the negatives and all copies of the movie. Luckily for film buffs some copies were preserved. IMHO it remains the best movie based on Dracula.

Notice that in Stoker’s novel, Dracula is not destroyed by daylight, and is even seen going about during the day. He just doesn’t like daylight, it weakens him.

Semi-hijack–

a top-notch graphic novel adaptation of Dracula.

And there have been at least two novels written in the past few decades combining those characters. (Plus the more sprawling pastiches like Kim Robinson’s Anno Dracula and the League of Extraordinary Gentlemen graphic novels, which combine dozens of contemporary fictional and real people.)