Got a link? There’s not much on the telly tonight.
It’s here. The noted fun starts toward the bottom of the first page.
Yeah, I should have provided a link to the event in question. Thanks, Pork Rind!
And, since he’s not worth responding to in a civil way. I’ll just respond here.
Who cares what you think about other people’s motivations, you stupid little cum bubble? When you say horseshit like like this, it says more about yourself than it does about anyone else. I know I ain’t cool, and no amount of music nerdery will make me so. Having positions that are easily verifiable as being at odds with reality isn’t making you cool, either. Still, you persist with them.
Actually, it’s the exact fucking opposite. I’m saying you can be technical and still play punk -then I provided examples of that being done. Since I’m not a moron, I don’t think that you have to play well to play Rock at all, and it’s largely been a free-for all since the start WRT ability. You’re the one making absolute statements and pushing them. You don’t even have the sense to know how to attack my position. Here’s a hint, fucktard: try to somehow attack my example’s status as “punk”. If you knew a goddamn thing about them, you’d know that one of my examples WROTE a song titled I’m Not A Punk, released on the same fucking album as the song I linked to. I was intentionally pitching soft balls. If you’d even bothered to educate yourself on the subject enough to read the Wiki entry on them, we could have had a discussion, because you’d then know enough about them to discuss it. You chose to remain an ignorant pile of rotten placenta, never to become a real boy.
I’ve had bowel movements who understood logic and argument better than you do. In fact, every one of my bowel movements is a genius in comparison to you - they don’t say shit they can’t back up.
Yep, and the thread advertised what it was doing in the title. You’re some sort of fucking chatbot that can’t actually understand the English you yourself spout, though. So, why should I be surprised that you’re astonished at its contents?
I DON’T KNOW! Why the fuck were you so stupid to assert that it is relevant? Oh wait, yeah, so you could troll me for a few posts denying something you yourself quoted in your inability to understand the board software.
scabpicker, welcome to my world. Quite the button pusher, isn’t he?
Don’t let him goad you into fucking his cactus, man. That’s his job. He’s still That Guy, as noted above. Just have Skynet reawaken this thread and it will help you resist the urge.
Yeah, and after one post where they let up (without even a mea culpa on doing it and denying it), they’re back to pushing the definition they swear they weren’t pushing. What a complete waste of basic elements and electrons. If the nitwit can’t tell the difference between the playing of Dr. Know and Ted Nugent, they might not be capable of commenting intelligently on the subject.
And if I may be so unkind: I’m beginning to suspect that they couldn’t play either’s leads (even though Nugent’s are pretty easy, Dr. K’s are fucking HARD), and that’s why they seem to resent them and lump them together. I dunno, I don’t really care enough to find out if I’m right. Dude’s now batting worse than adaher at being obstinately wrong on their favorite subjects in the face of evidence to the contrary.
Thank you for this thread, any responses I actually make to this fool will be in here. I don’t really care to talk to them, and ranting makes me feel better after reading the stupid.
Bad Brains fucking rock!
I’m bumping this thread.
This is the stupidest post I’ve read in a long time. He’s trying to convince me I’m playing rock, without having heard my music! He’s of course trying to deny himself having defined punk in any way before, calling defining things unpunk, while defining what punk is again.
Yes, he is asserting that “Punk doesn’t sound practiced to <him>” and that’s that. It’s okay, he doesn’t believe a guitarist can be a true artist, either.
Smug, douchebag troll. Yep.
Yeah, for sure. I was actually getting my hopes up with this post… It seemed like something might have sinked in. Alas, no dice…:o
Jesus, he just can’t help himself I guess.
I think I have a new word for that tone he takes: Boardsplainin’.
My new word for when he hijacks somene else’s ATMB thread to blubber about this thread some more is: Fuckhurt.
Example: *Drad Dog is all fuckhurt again about this thread. *
Good lord. The kerfuffle that keeps on kerfuffling. Fuckhurt indeed.
ddog, I have no idea what being a stalinist (small s or big) means in this case, but given how you’re the one who’s given the phrase its value, maybe it means “deluded cactus fucker”.
You haven’t changed your posting behavior - e.g., Punk is however you define it, and if folks disagree with you, you take shots at them - so I have no problem giving this tether ball another whack.
Hah! Come to think of it, them being a “stalinist” would line right up with their dictatorial style. Too bad the secret police think he’s an idiot, too.
From what I learned at Wikipedia University this morning, the primary tenets of Stalinism were class-based violence, purges and executions, and deportations, and who among us isn’t a proponent of at least one of those? Or maybe he’s just a big fan of catastrophic agricultural policies that lead to genocidal famine?
Well, there’s also the cult of personality and the primacy of the Soviet Union.
Or the *fabulous *mustache.
Bingo: ddog likely has one of those.
Actually I picture him with some wispy half-assed Che Guevara thing on his upper lip. And a dorky little soul patch.
And a beret? Please say there’s a beret!
I’m gonna guess pork pie hat. Or a trilby, only for the satisfaction of schooling anyone who calls it a fedora.