TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, DMARK WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY CONFUSION OF HIS LOGIN NAME WITH THAT OF SAID BANNED DOPER, UNDER ANY CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY OR OTHER LEGAL OR EQUITABLE THEORY FOR (I) ANY SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH VERBIAGE OR POSTS WRITTEN BY DRMARK2000, EVEN IF DOPERS HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF SUCH DAMAGES OR THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES; (II) THE COST OF PROCURING SUBSTITUTE GOODS, SERVICES, OR TECHNOLOGY; (III) PERSONAL INSULT OR INJURY, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, DEATH, CAUSED BY YOUR USE OR MISUSE OF THE SITE; OR (IV) AGGRIVATION LIABILITY IN EXCESS OF $100.
Thank you for your understanding in this difficult time.
:dubious: Nice try, drmark2000, but we’ve been around the block a few times. Going five years into the past and registering an account with a similar username is the oldest trick in the book. Denying any connection between the two accounts just makes you look even more guilty.
Next time you try to play us for chumps, remember who you’re dealing with.
Same, same. Even tho I enjoy the witty banter that this thread is devolving towards, this is the reason I keep checking back. Perhaps a new thread, specifically addressing the post in question? Since it is, after all, a question about Mod/Admin actions…
As if Tuba would actually post to such a thread. She seems to have a complete Napoleon complex, and doesn’t understand how to interact civily with others who contradict her view of herself.
I’m happy that there has been some backlash to Tuba’s “what’s a girl to do?” comment when she banned drmark2000.
Yes, what could you possibly have done? Not exercised power you possess? Of course not! You have to wield your little power, because otherwise people might not take you seriously!