Thanks for your rant. I too try to make responsible consumer choices, and do you know what? It’s harder than you seem to think. So I have a counter-rant:
To be truly ‘organic’ you need to
buy only things that
- were grown or manufactured locally
- you can be certain about what was involved in their manufacture, and that none of them are harmful (or imported)
- are completely biodegradeable with no harm to the environment
… and so on, and so on. This means giving up chocolate, fruit in the winter (in northern climes), commercially available flowers, any automobile, etc. The point: it’s impossible, and we can only do the best we can. This is why I object to your trying to claim the moral high ground. You may not drive an SUV, but how well is your house insulated? What coffee do you drink? If you had to choose between fair-trade and organic, which would you pick?
This is not an excuse to not try to be a responsible consumer. But rather than starting with the premise that all consumer items are okay, and then eliminating them one by one (Ben and Jerry’s, the Gap etc), start with the premise that none of them are okay, that they all involve oppressing someone/polluting the environment etc somewhere along the line, and look for things that explicitly do not. It’s like boycotting Nike but wearing Adidas - THEY’RE JUST AS BAD. We all have to (or choose to) live in this consumer-based society, so we are all obliged to make choices. Making people think about the consequences of their choices is the best thing we can do ('is the damage of your SUV really worth the convenience?), judging their choices is counter-productive.
Another minor nitpick re: drugs. Most pot is grown locally and organically - if you can grow it in your backyard, why would you pay for it to be imported from somewhere? My internet server won’t let me search for things like this (i’m at work) so feel free to investigate it yourself, but Colombian drug lords have very little to do with weed, you would be better off worrying about the tobacco. If you find evidence to the contrary, I’d love to see it.
Your point is otherwise valid. I believe people should take responsibility for all their consumer decisions, and driving a monstrous gas-guzzler that puts the lives of other drivers, and pedestrians, in danger, is (I believe) unjustifiable. But venomous attacks like yours will tend to put people off. you know, flies … honey … vinegar