Just as long as she doesn’t show us her cock…
I figure it’ll cost about $40 in hard liquor and recreational drugs to get that image out. I’ll bill you.
That seems kinda harsh. Can’t we just give him a really forceful swirlie and call it even?
Waterboarding certainly:
“Waterboarding is a form of torture which is used to obtain information, coerce confessions, and for punishment and intimidation. Waterboarding consists of immobilizing an individual and pouring water over his face to simulate drowning, which produces a severe gag reflex, making the subject believe his death is imminent while ideally not causing permanent physical damage.”
Also thought to have been used at Guantanamo and elsewhere in the Us’s Torture System.
For some reason, I’ve got this image in my head of James Cagney strutting around a stage wearing a top hat and carrying a cane, while singing the following:
Duct Tape Bushes Head,
Shackle him to the floor,
shit on his flag
and freeze the Cunt
Needs work though.
Exactly…she’s already a pretty frigid bitch.
Frigid bitch, yeh, but pretty? :dubious:
So you…ah…tried?
Hey, if you bought her book, she’s already screwed you.
Especially if you bought it in Soviet Russia.
*Swing her high and swing her low,
Turn her loose and on you go.
Now your right, now your own,
Meet your partner and promenade home.
Sick the dogs and do a lap dance,
Make the prisoner shit his pants.
Waterboard him, then chain him to the floor,
Rummy says it’s o.k., so do it once more.*
Does that help?
It’s been linked in the OP. It doesn’t seem like there’s an awful lot of familiarity with what’s in the link, so I thought I’d show some of it for the edification of the mouse-click challenged.
I was wondering if Pjen, or perhaps some other person might tell me how that last paragraph justifies the duct taping of Bush’s head, shitting on his flag, and freezing “the cunt.”
That’s ok, because I know you appreciate and love me for it.
I’d be interested in learning the significance of “no” where it appears in the handwritten notes.
I’d also like to know how to correlate the term “Positive responses” with a percentage of likelyhood that an alleged incident did take place subtantially as reported.
huh? had a couple windows open?
This comment already made me crack up, and your location only helped me along. 
…aaaannd, as long as I’m wishing for stuff, I’d like to see GWB with a duck taped to his beard.
And a pony.
I’m having some trouble with that, too. I’m guessing from context that a “no” means that is either thought not to have occured or is denied by the DOD representatives. Note that other notes say that such and such is an approved techniqe by the DOD, but not by the FBI or what have you.
It’s more than a little confusing, but it’s good to see somebody else actually trying to figure it out.
Me, too. The most credible, IMO is the “environment down” technique which appears to be approved by the DOD and is reported quite often.
The lap dance seems pretty difficult to beleive. I also remember from another news story about how one of “flying mullahs” talked about how muslim children were being persecuted by hordes of kids who would throw shoes at them. Throwing shoes is a particularly bad muslim insult and not a customary insult that you’d expect a horde of American kids to be familiar with and employ. So, I don’t really credit the flying mullah’s accustion.
Similarly, I have trouble with the credibilit of the wiping of menstrual fluid on the faces of the detainees by female interrogators. While the detainee might have a cultural hang up about it, it doesn’t seem the kind of thing that would leap to mind for us to do.
The “lap dance” is difficult to believe? This is the country that produces people who think holding pig races next door to a proposed mosque is going to make the Muslims decide not tobuild it. :rolleyes:
Thinking a “lap dance” is going to freak out a Muslim detainee to the point where he spills his guts doesn’t strike me as all that fat-fetched.
Ditto with the menstrual blood whether real or simulated.
Unless the detainee is Dave Foley. Then they’re just barking up the wrong tree.
I’m just not seeing it. “This one’s tough. We can’t break him.” “Hmm, okay then. Put him in the comfy chair and give him a lap dance. If that doesn’t work tell her to give him a hummer. Next we’ll make him eat his favorite ice cream real fast, so he gets a headache.”
Or she could be really ugly.
Not exactly how I’d envision such a tactic being carried out. But I’d like to clarify that I’m speculating on a perception by the jailers that the detainees would respond to such psychological stressors.
And actually the bit about Dave Foley was because he has a good attitude about menstruation.