[QUOTE=you with the face]
“Length and quality of time” based on your own subjective feelings of what’s appropriate.
[/quote]
And there are “objective” feelings of what’s appropriate? Aside from egregious offenses like abuse, infidelity, etc., I’m not sure what objective criteria you’d accept. Does “they hardly know each other” count? Or “they seem to be totally immature and have no idea what they want, and are caught up in the idea of being in love”? Probably not. But I’m guessing that’s what the OP is seeing.
Aren’t you a little late with this bandwagoning post? It’s all been said already. No one liked NightRabbit’s rant. I think she gets it. I doubt “real tales of woe” would sway anyone at this point, since it seems that nothing she says here will be given any credit.
Well, duh. Until the couples in question actually get divorced, of course it’s all potentialities. And you know, sometimes people in abusive relationships, with incompatible valued and habits, sexual problems, infidelity, etc., stay together. So, there’s really no way to know whose relationship will work and whose won’t. Saying two people hardly know each other, or are young and immature, obviously isn’t a basis for having doubts. I suspect the upshot of this thread is “you can’t have an opinion about other people’s relationship decisions.” Which is pretty hilarious, considering the many threads on this subject that don’t raise this much Cain.