You know, that’s a compelling argument. You half way got me thinking you’re on to the right solution.
Careful, Spanky, you’ll be challenging me to a knife-fight next.
So you admit you’re outnumbered, then?
Shut up, Airlock Boy. The leaders of the Snuggly Puppy Rebellion are negotiating with Ed now. The first thing we all agreed on is stuffing your stupid ass out the nearest window on Battlestar Straight Dope.
I’m sure you know I won’t be going peaceably.
Good. 
Dude. You’re doing it wrong. You need to say something with feeling!
BRING IT BITCH!
Something like that.
Well played.
Choir boys aren’t allowed to cuss.
It hurts our delicate constitutions.
You got anything else?
as long as you go.
Good luck with that.
Must be a new rule. “In My Day” choir boys and altar boys generally swore like drunken sailors when the “old people” weren’t around 
He’s our poster boy for why we need more vulgar words in the Pit. There aren’t currently enough to adequately mock him with.
That wasn’t a warning. You seemed to think you were insulted in this thread. I wanted to let you know that the level of insult wasn’t even close to what you’d experience if the old Pit rules were in place.
Then you lost the moment you put in that dig about unemployment. The fact that you lost your cool and put in the dig about the unemployment shows that your level of maturity is not above reaching for a low insult.
Then you lost there as well. Your underlying argument was that vulgarity (which is what the new Pit rules are about) should not be used in an argument. You seem to have lost sight of that. I used no vulgarity in my post. And to my recollection, I never have in any post except to discuss the word itself or to quote others. So you really should have no issue with it, but here you are feeling threatened by my “warning” and analogizing my words to a call for a bar fight.*
And what is this victory? What do we win?
If the objective was to make your opponent look idiotic, the easiest route to victory is for your opponent to do it himself. Then all that’s left is the mocking and name-calling. That’s why everyone is mocking you and itching to do some name-calling. . . if only the appropriate words were available.
Oddly enough, I haven’t called you a single name but you’ve replied to all those who have, and I’m probably the only one you’re not directly quoting and the only one you’re not talking directly to.
I offer that challenge to you. You started this thread. What’s your argument? And why is sarcasm necessary to communicate it?
Asking for your argument is slightly unfair at this point because Ed has already proven you wrong in so many ways that to go back would just be an embarrassment. But if you still have a point left, please make it.
Sorry, but I don’t go to bars with strange men.
*in case you were threatened that I might actually have been issuing a warning for a bar fight, it might relieve you to know that it’s highly unlikely since. . . I’m a girl.
And btw, where do I get some of that internet testosterone? Maybe I could bottle it. Should be worth something.
I’m a strange man. You thirsty? 
nvm
I’m there, baby. 
You’re not nearly as strange as raindog. I understand most of your points, even if I haven’t seen all of them. 
I’ve got time.
I like playing in the sand but honestly that Poppins woman always gave me the creeps. And Guin please keep the cats away from me. They make me wheeze. Even if you think I’m a bit of a pussy for not joining up to battle Ed’s deathstar.
Yes, I Love Me, the definition of maturity is typing out cunt and fuck on an anonymous message board. Yeah. Anyone who doesn’t enjoy playing that way is a little baby. Okay. Yeah, that stupidity gives me a smile (as I build my little sandcastles).
Once again, I see no reason not to let you play however you want to play and to give you the corner of the playground to do it in. (Just careful cause that’s also where the dogs shit.) I see no reason why just tightening the definition of how much of being a jerk was okay in the Pit wouldn’t have sufficed and this listing of verboten words stupidly created “an issue.” Yeah, the administration is being stupid for not hearing that these oh so mature and self-aggrandizing posters just must have their section to vulgarly act out in. (I know someone with Tourettes who has the corporalia - not all do - but is okay if he can go to private place to let it out for a while … maybe its like that?) Really. It should be here and the Administration would be wise to revisit the question. There wasn’t anything broken that needed fixin’. But this big of a deal? Over what was a stupidly expressed and overly controlling and condescending “don’t be a real big jerk even in the Pit”? I just can’t see it.
Nitpick: DSeid, it’s coprolalia. Shit speak.
I also don’t think that anyone has made the claim that typing out “cunt” makes one mature. But that strawman sure burns good, don’t he?
Ach. Sorry 'bout that. You are correct about the spelling.
But Hentor while not the exact words, that was the essence of I Love Me’s claim, at least a I read it, that made me laugh at the silliness of his POV:
No straw man to make fun of that: it’s stupid.
Nothing to do with the issue of whether or not coprolalia should be allowed unfettered, and again I see no reason that it should not (but I can’t get worked up about having some limits placed on its use either), but a stupid comment in the Pit deserves mocking just because. It is not “adult” to “rough-house” in that way, and it is not childish or immature to believe that gratuitous and uncreative vulgarity farted out with no humor attached but just as part of jerkiness is something to be avoided. Saying that is just dumb.
Jesus.
No one has defined “maturity” as “typing out cunt and fuck on an anonymous message board.” That would be a stupid position.
The point is, maturity is also not defined as “not typing out cunt and fuck on an anonymous message board.” That appears to be your position, and that of raindog, and it is also a stupid position.
Maturity, cleverness, wit, these are all things that cannot be rigidly defined by the specific vocabulary one uses. Removing the words from the list of acceptable insults will no more make the Pit more “mature” or “more civil” or “more intelligent” than removing the word cashew would, because for Pete’s sake, they’re words. They’re tools, and they can be used in the service of intelligence or of rank stupidity same as every other word. If we banned every word used by raindog to advance the cause of stupidity in this thread, we’d be left with nothing other than fuck, shit, and asshole.
That management thinks the way to elevate the level of discourse is to eliminate a certain kind of word used in a certain kind of way is the problem. I’m fine if you disagree that this is a problem, but the constant insistence with which you and raindog have mischaracterized the arguments against this new rule is obnoxious and, to my mind, rank trolling.