My personal feeling is that it’s mostly the faculty and the administration, and the lousy communication. But I will admit that I’m biased, being a student and all.
Most of the students left are really pretty bright, and they’re all, as far as I can see, hard workers (harder than me, to be honest. I’m coasting on intellect; I’m actually a lousy student, but I test pretty well. That’s getting shaky for me now.) As I said, they all have previous college experience with good grades. Most of them are adult learners, and motivation to graduate is very, very high.
If “they” were to ask me, I’d say, "We have too many teachers and too many test programs and too many textbooks. We’re given different things to learn for different tests (ie, learn this for the class test and that for the HESI and NCLEX probably wants this third answer). We’re given conflicting information from different teachers and texts (eg. different lab values as “norms”). We’re corrected after our failures instead of presented with information up front (eg: for three semesters in Med Surg, we’re taught that the first sign of shock is a drop in blood pressure. We got all the way through OB before someone thought to tell us that a drop on blood pressure is the *last *sign of shock in a pregnant or postpartum woman. grr.) Our classes are moved, days and times and locations miles away, sometimes with no notice at all (by which I mean, more than once another student has called me because they heard a rumor that the class today was now at X Hospital instead of Y, and did I know anything about it and I didn’t, because there is no communication from the staff.)
This is another thing I can’t get them to communicate. I just don’t know the attrition rate in the past after the first year.
No. There are a couple of them, but most of us are adult learners, second career, and overwhelmingly because Nursing is what we’ve always wanted to do before life got in the way. We’ve got teachers, paramedics, a lawyer or two, and lots of degreed, white collar professionals changing career paths, but it’s because of passion, not desparation.
Funny you should say that. Admissions used to be lottery based, after you met minimum requirements. Mine was the first class that was “Points” based, meaning you got Points for specific academic achievements (degrees, GPA, etc.), and the students with the most Points were accepted, with a lottery used for the bottom pool of ties. So, theoretically, my class should be BETTER students than classes in the past…which is also what the teachers tell us! They do acknowledge that we’re “better” than previous classes in terms of knowledge and critical thinking. So why are so many of us failing? Theoretically, the Points system seems great, but could that have somehow selected a *worse *class?