No, because I have good insurance.
Plus, if I had an ongoing medical condition I wouldn’t want to break my continuity of care.
Plus, the Affordable Care Act gives me reasonable options should I lose my job. US liberals complain that it isn’t the universal care plan of their dreams, but it gets us most of the way there, at least in the states which fully cooperate.
Plus, I have family ties to my area.
The one reason that I would consider moving to Canada a medical plus, if all other was the same, is that there is a lower intensity of care. Canada has less of what I see as over-testing and over-treatment, with more emphasis on primary care. I like that. However, some people like the specialist-oriented, testing-heavy US model. So, on balance, I think health care would be, in immigration/emigration terms, a wash.
Sounds right.
Massachusetts and Louisiana have a lot more bigger difference in standard of living than the US and Canada, but Massachusetts and Louisiana have similar population growth rates.
There’s one territorial area of the US that has been seeing substantial population loss. That’s Puerto Rico, which has little more than half the per capita income of what is, most years, the poorest US state, Mississippi. That’s the kind of differential needed to drive migration. And, between the US and Canada, the differential is not there.
I’m all for tearing down the barriers, on our side, between the US and Canada. Canada can, of course, do as it wants.